We will need an industry that spends its time fact-checking “fact-checkers”. This is the story of a landmark study in The Lancet, which provided support for those who argued natural immunity to COVID-19 was an alternative to vaccination.
The idea of natural immunity being taken into consideration when discussing vaccine mandates or vaccine passports has been rejected by the powers that have been for years.
They were so wrong that even mainstream media had to admit it.
Oh. pic.twitter.com/HLxOPZaS2F
— Amy Curtis (@RantyAmyCurtis) February 17, 2023
An incredible visual in The Lancet proving that prior Covid infection confers better protection than vaccinations (It’s the longest line on these graphs). This should put the issue to rest once and for all. pic.twitter.com/NFp6SrKfXZ
— Eli Klein (@TheEliKlein) February 17, 2023
Another common misconception, that Omicron is the only vaccine that confers natural immunity, has been dispelled by this study. If you examine the graphs above, the longest lines represent natural immunity.
They were wrong and destroyed many lives. Worse, they wanted the truth to remain a secret about how wrong they were. To clarify the situation, this type of study could have been conducted two years ago. Israel actually did a similar study in 2021 and produced almost the same results. While the Biden administration, its press allies, and continued to push for vaccine mandates or vaccine passports, it was ignored.
What number of people were fired for this decision? How many people lost their jobs because of this decision? How many people were kicked out of military service for not getting the vaccine that they needed? Biden, Fauci and other people refusing to recognize natural immunity are just a few of the many horrible outcomes. It was unimaginable.
Even though this is the news, experts are trying to minimize it. Here’s a line from the NBC News report. It also mentions that boosters are still being promoted because they have become a religious rite.
Dr. Bob Wachter is the head of the University of California San Francisco’s department of medicine. He said that he didn’t expect the protection against infection to be as strong as what the meta-analysis revealed.
Wachter, who wasn’t involved in the research, said that “the protection against severe infections, both its extent and duration, at almost one year is really high.”
These are the people who have misled you for many years. These people should not be viewed with prejudice. Americans should also remember who took away their freedoms based on insufficient data. The CDC had both the capacity and the sample size to test natural immunity in the eight- to a ten-month period of the pandemic. They didn’t because they didn’t want to. It was important to keep the excuses for Biden’s horrible policies (as many other terrible state-level policies) in place. They must be held accountable.
