A child, presumably under the supervision of leftist parents who believe in “free-range parenting” and “artistic expression,” managed to damage a multi-million dollar Mark Rothko painting at the Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen in Rotterdam.

We’re talking about “Grey, Orange on Maroon, No. 8,” a massive 7.5 by 8.5-foot abstract work created in 1960. Now, let’s say, for the sake of argument, that abstract art is subjectively valuable. Even if you don’t personally appreciate Rothko’s color fields, the objective reality is that the free market has determined his works to be worth millions. One of his pieces sold for $23.9 million just last year. That’s not feelings; that’s economics 101.

@sothebys

A stunning moment at #SothebysHongKong Maison as Mark Rothko’s ‘Untitled (Yellow and Blue)’ became the third most valuable Western artwork ever sold in Asia, achieving an astonishing $253M HKD in our Modern and Contemporary Evening Auction. Watch Alex Branczik bring the gavel down on this monumental masterpiece. There is still time to bid on the Modern & Contemporary Day Auctions, beginning tomorrow 12 November @ 10:30AM HKT. Link in bio to discover more from the Hong Kong Sales, presented in partnership with @CELINE.

♬ original sound – Sotheby’s

So what happened here? The museum claims there was an “unguarded moment.” Let me translate that from leftist-speak: they failed to enforce basic rules and boundaries. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how to preserve cultural heritage. The idea that children should be allowed unfettered access to priceless artworks is insane.

The painting sustained “superficial damage” with “small scratches” visible in the lower part. The left will undoubtedly argue that this is no big deal. But here’s where the logic breaks down. If A (the painting) is worth millions, and B (any damage) reduces its value, then C (the child’s actions) have objectively caused significant financial harm. It’s simple syllogistic reasoning.

The vast majority of museum visitors manage not to deface the artworks. So what’s different here? I’ll tell you what: a culture of permissiveness and a lack of personal responsibility, both hallmarks of leftist ideology. This isn’t just about one painting; it’s about the erosion of respect for private property and cultural institutions.

In conclusion, proper supervision and adherence to rules could have prevented this entirely. And that’s something the left simply cannot refute, no matter how much they whine about “child expression” or “accidents happen.” Grow up, take responsibility, and respect our cultural heritage. It’s not that complicated.