Screenshot
A Wisconsin judge, Hannah Dugan of the Milwaukee County Circuit Court, is scheduled to appear in federal court on Thursday to face obstruction charges. The charges allege that Judge Dugan assisted a migrant in evading immigration arrest in her courtroom, a case with potential implications for the federal government’s immigration enforcement policy.
The prosecution asserts that Judge Dugan attempted to thwart the intended arrest by directing federal agents away from the vicinity of her courtroom and guiding the migrant, identified as Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, through a non-public exit.
Dugan’s legal team maintains her innocence. They have requested the dismissal of the indictment, asserting that as a judge, Dugan is immune from prosecution for her official actions and that the case encroaches on state authority. “The government’s prosecution of Judge Dugan is virtually unprecedented and entirely unconstitutional,” her lawyers argued in a court filing.
This development follows earlier reports that the Justice Department, under the Trump administration, pledged to investigate local officials who obstruct the administration’s stringent immigration enforcement. State courthouses have increasingly become a magnet for federal immigration operations, yet this practice has faced opposition from advocates, citing concerns that undocumented people may be discouraged from seeking legal services.
To understand this fully, we should note that Judge Dugan, first elected in 2016, has dedicated much of her career to representing low-income litigants in cases related to civil rights and domestic abuse issues.
The significance becomes clear when we consider the case of Flores-Ruiz, who was scheduled to appear in Dugan’s courtroom on assault charges on April 18. Reports indicate that Flores-Ruiz, previously deported to Mexico, was targeted for arrest by federal immigration agents who had secured an administrative warrant.
The complaint against Dugan, citing witnesses, alleges that the judge became angered upon learning that law enforcement agents intended to arrest Flores-Ruiz outside her courtroom following the hearing. According to the complaint, she first directed a group of agents to an office down the hallway. She then privately addressed the Flores-Ruiz case and guided Flores-Ruiz and his attorney through a non-public “jury door”.
The document notes that Flores-Ruiz was later spotted by law enforcement in a public hallway and chased on foot before being arrested outside the courthouse.
This raises important questions about the balance between federal immigration enforcement and the autonomy of state officials. As this case progresses, it will continue to draw attention to the broader implications of aggressive immigration enforcement policies.
The superyacht Bayesian, owned by British technology magnate Mike Lynch, which tragically sank off the…
A Louisiana law, first of its kind, classifying two commonly used abortion-inducing drugs as 'controlled…
Germany has thrown its support behind President Donald Trump's insistence on a substantial hike in…
The Republican tax bill is dancing a Texas two-step through the halls of Congress, and…
President Donald Trump, with his usual bravado, expressed no surprise on Thursday when his Russian…
A San Antonio woman stands accused of aiding and abetting her son's potential reign of…