Prop 50 Passes as California Scraps Nonpartisan Maps for Partisan Power Grab

California voters approved Proposition 50 on Tuesday, effectively abandoning the state’s independent redistricting commission in favor of partisan maps drawn by the Democrat-controlled legislature. The move could flip five congressional seats to Democrats and potentially determine control of the U.S. House of Representatives in 2026.

Let us be clear about what happened here. California Democrats, who have long championed “independent” redistricting commissions as bastions of fairness and democracy, just convinced voters to throw that system in the trash the moment it became politically inconvenient. The hypocrisy is staggering, but entirely predictable.

The facts are straightforward. Republicans currently hold a razor-thin majority in the House with 219 seats compared to Democrats’ 213. Five seats represent the difference between maintaining legislative power and losing it entirely. California Democrats recognized this mathematical reality and acted accordingly, prioritizing raw political power over the principles they claim to hold dear.

Governor Gavin Newsom championed Proposition 50, framing it explicitly as resistance to President Trump. This reveals the true nature of the effort. This was not about fair representation or protecting voters’ interests. This was about partisan warfare, pure and simple.

The proposition asked California voters to suspend congressional maps drawn by the state’s independent commission and replace them with rejiggered districts adopted by the Democratic-controlled legislature. These new districts would remain in place for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 elections, giving Democrats three election cycles to capitalize on their gerrymandered advantage.

Here is where the logic falls apart for Democrats nationally. For years, the left has decried gerrymandering as an existential threat to democracy. They have filed countless lawsuits challenging Republican-drawn maps. They have demanded independent commissions as the only legitimate method of drawing district lines. Yet when California already has such a commission, and that commission produces maps Democrats dislike, suddenly the independent process must be overridden.

The argument that this represents some kind of counterbalance to Republican redistricting in Texas is equally absurd. Two wrongs do not make a right. If gerrymandering is wrong when Republicans do it, it remains wrong when Democrats do it. The principle either matters or it does not.

What makes this particularly egregious is the brazenness of the effort. Democrats did not even attempt to hide their intentions. Newsom explicitly positioned this as anti-Trump legislation. The entire campaign centered on partisan advantage rather than any pretense of fairness or representation.

California voters bear responsibility for this outcome. They were presented with a straightforward choice: maintain an independent redistricting process or hand map-drawing power to partisan legislators. They chose partisanship. Whether they fully understood the implications or simply voted along party lines, the result is the same.

The 2026 midterm elections will likely hinge on a handful of competitive districts nationwide. California Democrats have now positioned themselves to manufacture five additional seats through legislative cartography rather than winning them through persuasive policy arguments. This represents a fundamental corruption of the democratic process, regardless of which party engages in it.

The ball now sits in Republicans’ court to determine whether they will respond in kind or maintain principled opposition to gerrymandering regardless of partisan advantage. The integrity of the House of Representatives hangs in the balance.

Related: Senate Majority Leader Says Votes Not There to Eliminate Filibuster Despite Trump Pressure