Trump Backs Direct Healthcare Payments to Citizens Instead of Obamacare Funding

President Donald Trump proposed Saturday that Senate Republicans eliminate Obamacare’s insurance company subsidies and redirect those hundreds of billions of dollars directly to American citizens, allowing them to purchase their own healthcare plans.

The proposal represents a fundamental shift in how the federal government would approach healthcare funding. Rather than funneling taxpayer money through insurance companies to prop up what Trump characterized as a failing system, Americans would receive the funds directly to make their own healthcare decisions.

“I am recommending to Senate Republicans that the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars currently being sent to money sucking Insurance Companies in order to save the bad Healthcare provided by ObamaCare, BE SENT DIRECTLY TO THE PEOPLE SO THAT THEY CAN PURCHASE THEIR OWN, MUCH BETTER, HEALTHCARE, and have money left over,” Trump wrote.

This is not complicated economics. The current system takes taxpayer dollars, runs them through a bureaucratic apparatus, hands them to insurance companies who take their cut, and then provides Americans with increasingly expensive healthcare that satisfies virtually no one. Trump’s proposal would eliminate the middleman entirely.

Senator Rick Scott of Florida immediately embraced the concept, announcing he would draft legislation creating Health Savings Account-style accounts for Americans. “We must stop taxpayer money from going to insurance companies and instead give it directly to Americans in HSA-style accounts and let them buy the health care they want,” Scott stated. “This will increase competition and drive down costs.”

The logic here is sound. Competition drives down prices in every other sector of the economy. When consumers control their own healthcare dollars, providers must compete for their business. When the government funnels money through insurance companies, those companies have little incentive to reduce costs or improve service.

The proposal comes as the government shutdown enters its second month, now the longest in American history. The impasse centers precisely on these Obamacare subsidies. Republicans have voted more than a dozen times for a clean continuing resolution that maintains current funding levels without policy changes. Democrats have refused each time, demanding specific Obamacare subsidies be included.

House Speaker Mike Johnson argued last week that Democrats want American taxpayers to fund healthcare for illegal immigrants, creating the current stalemate. Johnson previously noted that the expiring Obamacare subsidy “is subsidizing bad policy. We’re throwing good money at a bad, broken system, and so it needs real reforms.”

The facts support this assessment. Obamacare premiums have consistently increased since the law’s implementation. Americans pay more for plans with higher deductibles and fewer choices. The individual mandate, the law’s supposed lynchpin, was effectively eliminated, yet the system limps along on taxpayer-funded life support.

Democrats, meanwhile, blame Republicans for the shutdown, insisting the subsidies must continue. They reportedly view healthcare as their winning issue heading into midterm elections, suggesting political calculation rather than policy improvement drives their position.

Trump’s proposal offers a clear alternative. Give Americans control of their own healthcare dollars. Let them choose their providers, their plans, and their coverage levels. Allow competition to work as it does in every other market.

The question now is whether Senate Republicans will embrace this approach or continue funding a system that satisfies neither fiscal conservatives nor healthcare consumers. The shutdown may finally force the serious Obamacare reform that both parties have discussed but never delivered.

Trump also called for eliminating the filibuster, though he noted this was “unrelated” to the healthcare proposal. That suggestion will likely prove far more controversial among Senate Republicans than redirecting healthcare subsidies to American citizens.

Related: UCLA Faces Civil Rights Investigation for Operating Discriminatory Scholarship Programs