House Committee Exposes FireAid’s Bait and Switch on Wildfire Relief

## When Charity Becomes a Shell Game

Here’s what gets me. You watch people lose everything in a wildfire. Homes reduced to ash. Family photos, heirlooms, entire lives erased in hours. Then celebrities throw a concert, raise over $100 million, and promise every dollar goes to victims. You’d think that’s straightforward enough, right?

Wrong.

The House Judiciary Committee just dropped a report that should make your blood boil. FireAid, the relief effort that pulled in those donations after the Palisades and Eaton fires devastated Southern California, apparently decided “fire victims” was too narrow a category. Why help just the people who lost their homes when you could fund your favorite nonprofits instead?

According to internal documents, roughly $75 million went to 188 different organizations. Sounds generous until you look closer. Community Organized Relief Efforts got $250,000 and specifically listed “undocumented migrants” as a priority group. Not displaced American families. Not elderly residents who lost their retirement homes. Illegal immigrants.

Let that sink in for a second.

## The Podcast Pivot Nobody Asked For

It gets better. The Altadena Talks Foundation received $100,000, which they funneled to podcasters talking about the wildfires. Toni Raines and others got paid to discuss the disaster. The committee’s report puts it bluntly: “It remains unclear how and if this FireAid money went to directly aid wildfire victims.”

You know what? I can clear that up. It didn’t.

FireAid defended themselves by saying they lack the “capability to make direct payments to individuals.” That’s convenient. You can organize a massive celebrity concert, coordinate with dozens of nonprofits, and process $100 million in donations, but cutting checks to actual victims? That’s beyond your skill set?

This is the nonprofit industrial complex in action. These organizations exist in a comfortable ecosystem where good intentions matter more than results. Where administrative costs are just part of doing business. Where “direct relief” means whatever they need it to mean on any given Tuesday.

## Follow the Money Trail

Another $500,000 went to administrative costs at various nonprofits. The California Charter Schools Association distributed grants to four charter schools for temporary facilities and counseling services. Now, helping displaced students sounds noble until you remember the original promise. This wasn’t the “FireAid Education Fund.” It was supposed to be emergency relief for people who lost everything.

The problem isn’t that these causes lack merit on their own. Helping immigrants, funding podcasts, supporting charter schools—fine. Have that debate. But don’t promise desperate fire victims that you’re raising money for them, then redirect it to your pet projects. That’s not charity. That’s fraud wrapped in good intentions.

Free-market principles work because they demand accountability. You sell a product, you deliver what you promised, or customers go elsewhere. But nonprofits operate in this weird space where failure gets rewarded with more funding. Where mission drift isn’t a bug, it’s a feature.

## The Bigger Picture Nobody Wants to See

This FireAid fiasco reveals something deeper about how progressive institutions operate. They see every crisis as an opportunity to fund their broader agenda. A wildfire becomes a vehicle for immigration advocacy. Disaster relief becomes a jobs program for activists and podcasters.

Meanwhile, actual victims wait. They navigate insurance claims, temporary housing, and the soul-crushing work of rebuilding from nothing. But sure, let’s make sure illegal immigrants and podcasters get their cut first.

FireAid insists the donations were “designated for direct relief and will not be used for administrative purposes.” The evidence suggests otherwise. When you’re paying nonprofits half a million in overhead and funding podcasters, you’ve redefined “direct relief” beyond recognition.

The House Judiciary Committee did the work mainstream journalists won’t. They obtained internal documents, traced the money, and exposed the bait and switch. This should be front-page news everywhere. Instead, it’ll probably get buried under the next news cycle.

Here’s the standard we should demand: if you raise money for fire victims, that money goes to fire victims. Not to organizations that serve fire victims among other priorities. Not to administrative costs. Not to podcasters discussing the tragedy. To the victims themselves.

It’s not complicated. It’s just honest. And apparently, that’s too much to ask from the people who claim to care most about helping others.

Related: America Just Proved the Doomers Dead Wrong About Our Military