Minnesota Republican Files Impeachment Articles Against Tim Walz Over $9 Billion Fraud Scandal

The facts here are staggering, and they demand accountability at the highest levels of Minnesota state government.

Republican state Representative Mike Wiener has officially filed articles of impeachment against Governor Tim Walz, following revelations of what may be the largest state-level fraud scandal in American history. Federal prosecutor Joseph Thompson confirmed last month that $9 billion in taxpayer money, possibly more, was stolen during Walz’s tenure as governor. Let that number sink in: nine billion dollars of hard-earned taxpayer money, gone.

The impeachment articles lay out four specific charges against Walz, each more damning than the last. First, that Walz knowingly concealed widespread fraud within the state’s Department of Human Services despite repeated warnings. Second, that he interfered with lawful oversight and investigation into the fraud. Third, that he prioritized political considerations above lawful administration. Fourth, that he failed to execute the laws of Minnesota, specifically those concerning stewardship of public funds.

These are not trivial accusations. These are allegations that strike at the heart of what it means to hold public office.

The fraud itself centers largely on programs serving Somali residents in Minnesota, with Thompson’s investigation revealing that 14 taxpayer-funded programs were systematically exploited. The scale of this theft is almost incomprehensible. For context, Minnesota’s entire annual state budget is approximately $72 billion. This fraud represents more than 12 percent of that total.

Wiener made his position crystal clear when speaking about the impeachment effort. “Democrat control of our state has led to 9 billion dollars of fraud that we currently know about,” he said. “Governor Walz said ‘the buck stops with him.’ Since he refused to resign the next step is impeachment.”

That last point deserves emphasis. Walz himself claimed the buck stops with him. Well, here is where that rhetoric meets reality. If you claim responsibility, you must accept accountability when catastrophic failure occurs under your watch.

The political math here is complicated but not impossible. Minnesota’s House is evenly split, with both parties holding exactly 67 seats. For the impeachment to advance, Wiener needs just one Democrat on committee to vote with Republicans. The question is whether any Democrat possesses the courage to put constituent interests above party loyalty.

Wiener framed the stakes plainly: “Our taxpayers are demanding this, and if the Democrats don’t support the impeachment they are complicit with the fraud.” He is absolutely correct. This is not about partisan politics. This is about whether elected officials will tolerate the largest theft of public funds in state history.

The timeline matters here. These were not isolated incidents discovered immediately and addressed. Thompson’s investigation revealed systematic fraud that persisted throughout Walz’s governorship. The articles specifically note that Walz received repeated warnings about the fraud and chose concealment over transparency.

Democrats now face a choice. They can stand with their governor and effectively endorse the negligence that allowed $9 billion to vanish, or they can stand with Minnesota taxpayers who deserve answers and accountability. The evenly divided legislature means one principled Democrat could make the difference.

Governor Walz had his opportunity to take responsibility by resigning. He declined. Representative Wiener has now initiated the constitutional remedy available when governors fail their duties so spectacularly. The ball is in the Minnesota legislature’s court.

Related: Minnesota’s ICE Crisis Just Forced Trump’s Hand on the Insurrection Act