American Women Are Moving to Mexico Because We Refused to Enforce Our Own Border

Lois Muñoz traded her waitress apron in Middletown, New York, for a cramped room in her husband’s family compound in Puebla, Mexico. She doesn’t have a car. She barely speaks Spanish. Her Christmas decorations, collected over years, are gone. Her Halloween stuff too. All of it, abandoned. But Alfredo won’t end up in an ICE detention center, so she calls it a win.

This is what happens when we spend decades refusing to enforce immigration law. Real people, American citizens like Lois, end up making impossible choices because we’ve created a system so broken that leaving the country feels easier than staying in it legally.

According to American Families United, about 1.5 million U.S. citizens live in fear of separation from partners who entered illegally or overstayed their visas. That’s not a small number. That’s a mid-sized American city’s worth of families caught in limbo because politicians on both sides spent generations kicking this can down the road. They wanted the cheap labor and the emotional talking points, but nobody wanted to actually fix anything.

Here’s the thing about illegal immigration that drives me crazy. We act like it’s a victimless policy choice, some abstract debate for cable news. But it’s not abstract for Lois, who sits in Mexico with her two cats as her only real company, trying to learn a language at an age when that’s not easy. It’s not abstract for the kids born into mixed-status marriages, growing up wondering which parent might disappear one day.

The Trump administration’s enforcement efforts have forced these decisions into the open. You can argue about the methods all day long, but at least someone’s finally acknowledging that laws mean something. When Alfredo crossed that border illegally almost two decades ago, he made a choice. He had reasons, sure. His parents were sick, he needed money. I get it. Poverty is real and desperation makes people do things they wouldn’t otherwise do.

But consequences are also real.

What grinds my gears is how we got here. Previous administrations, both Republican and Democrat, created this mess through selective enforcement and empty promises. They told people the rules mattered, then looked the other way when those rules got broken. They handed out work permits and driver’s licenses and in-state tuition, sending every signal except the one that mattered: that American citizenship and legal residency actually mean something.

Now families like the Muñozes are paying the price for that cowardice. Lois met Alfredo at a bar eighteen years ago when he asked her to dance. By the time he told her about his immigration status, they were already in love. What’s she supposed to do with that information? Leave him? Pretend she didn’t hear it? She chose to build a life with him anyway, knowing full well the sword hanging over their heads.

Mexico does make it relatively straightforward for Americans married to Mexican nationals to get residency and work permits under their Family Unit rules. That’s actually more generous than what we offer in reverse, which tells you something about whose immigration system is more functional in at least that one respect. But legal ease doesn’t translate to emotional ease. Lois lost her entire life, her social network, her independence, her language.

The loneliness in her voice comes through even in a video call. “Your husband’s there, but it’s not like you’ve got a friend,” she said. That’s the reality behind the statistics. Real isolation. Real sacrifice.

I don’t lack sympathy for these families. I really don’t. But sympathy can’t be the foundation of immigration policy. A nation that doesn’t control its borders isn’t really a nation at all. It’s just a geographic area with nice intentions and no backbone. We owe it to American citizens, including those married to foreign nationals, to create a system that’s both humane and enforceable. One that doesn’t force people to choose between their country and their spouse.

That system requires honest enforcement. It requires telling people upfront what the rules are and then actually following them. It means not letting millions of people live in legal gray zones for decades, building families and lives on foundations we all knew were unstable.

The current situation is forcing a reckoning that should have happened years ago. Some families are separating. Others are moving to Mexico together. Still others are risking detention and deportation. None of these options are good, but all of them were inevitable the moment we decided that immigration law was more of a suggestion than a requirement.

Lois Muñoz is living in Puebla now because her government failed her long before Trump took office. It failed her when it didn’t secure the border. It failed her when it didn’t create workable legal pathways. It failed her when it pretended that ignoring millions of illegal immigrants would somehow make the problem disappear.

She’s making the best of it, she says. Her husband is safe. That counts for something. But she shouldn’t have had to make this choice in the first place.

Related: Supreme Court Hands Parents a Massive Win Against California’s Gender Secrecy Law