Eric Swalwell has a problem. Actually, he’s got several problems, but right now the biggest one involves a suspected Chinese intelligence operative named Christine Fang and an FBI file he desperately doesn’t want you to see. The California Democrat is running for governor, and FBI Director Kash Patel is reportedly considering whether to release investigative records about Swalwell’s decade-old relationship with Fang. You know, the woman better known as “Fang Fang” who allegedly cozied up to California Democrats for espionage purposes.

Instead of welcoming transparency, Swalwell did what any politician with something to hide typically does. He lawyered up. His attorneys, Sean Hecker and Norm Eisen, fired off a cease-and-desist letter warning that releasing the files would violate federal privacy law and expose the FBI to “significant legal liability.” The letter reads like a threat wrapped in legalese, accusing Patel of attempting “a transparent attempt to smear him and undermine his campaign for Governor of California.”

Let’s pause here because the irony is thick enough to cut with a knife. This is the same Eric Swalwell who spent years on the House Intelligence Committee pushing every conceivable Trump-Russia collusion theory, demanding transparency, insisting the American people deserved to know about potential foreign interference. But now that the foreign interference involves him personally, suddenly privacy matters. Suddenly releasing investigative files is political warfare.

The relationship between Swalwell and Fang Fang isn’t new information. We’ve known for years that this suspected Chinese spy helped fundraise for Swalwell’s campaigns and cultivated connections with California Democrats. What we don’t know is everything that’s sitting in that FBI file. And that’s precisely what makes Swalwell nervous enough to threaten legal action against the bureau itself.

Here’s what bothers me most about this whole mess. When you’re running for governor of the largest state in the union, voters deserve full transparency about your past entanglements with foreign intelligence operatives. That shouldn’t be controversial. If those files contain nothing damaging, release them and move on. If they contain something problematic, well, that’s exactly why voters need to see them before heading to the polls.

Swalwell’s legal threats reveal a fundamental misunderstanding of how accountability works in a republic. You can’t spend years demanding investigations and transparency when it suits your political agenda, then hide behind privacy laws when the scrutiny turns your direction. That’s not principle. That’s opportunism.

The timing matters too. California’s gubernatorial race is wide open, and Swalwell faces voters in just weeks. Patel’s consideration of releasing these files isn’t happening in a vacuum. It’s happening at precisely the moment when California voters are deciding who should lead their state. Some will call that political interference. Others will call it necessary transparency before an important election.

I lean toward the latter view. The FBI investigated Swalwell’s relationship with a suspected Chinese spy. That investigation produced records. Those records belong to the American people, not to Eric Swalwell’s political career. If releasing them damages his gubernatorial ambitions, perhaps that says more about what’s in the files than about Patel’s motivations.

The broader issue here extends beyond one congressman’s embarrassing past. We’re watching a test case for how seriously we take foreign interference and espionage. China represents the most significant long-term threat to American security and prosperity. Their intelligence operations don’t involve dramatic car chases and dead drops in parking garages. They involve cultivating relationships with ambitious politicians, offering help with fundraising, building trust over time.

Swalwell either fell for that approach or ignored the warning signs. Either way, voters considering him for California’s highest office deserve the full story. Threatening the FBI with legal action to prevent that transparency isn’t the move of someone with nothing to hide. It’s the move of someone terrified of what sunlight might reveal.

Related: The No Kings Crowd Just Turned a Beloved American Song Into Political Theater