GOP Lawmakers Want Bachelet Vetoed as UN Secretary General Pick

Republicans in Congress are drawing a line in the sand. They want Secretary of State Marco Rubio to use America’s veto power at the United Nations Security Council to block Michelle Bachelet from becoming the next UN Secretary General. Their reasoning? She’s what they’re calling a “pro-abortion zealot” whose track record proves she’d weaponize the position to push abortion worldwide.

The bicameral group, led by New Jersey Congressman Chris Smith, sent Rubio a letter Thursday making their case crystal clear. Bachelet, who previously served as Chile’s president, doesn’t meet the standards the Trump administration should demand. Her entire career reads like a greatest hits album of abortion advocacy. Every position she’s held, she’s used to advance what these lawmakers view as an extreme anti-life agenda.

Here’s what makes this particularly significant. The United States isn’t just another voice at the UN table. We’re one of five permanent Security Council members with veto authority. That’s real power, the kind that can stop a nomination dead in its tracks. Republicans want Ambassador Michael Waltz to exercise that veto without hesitation.

“Dr. Bachelet’s resume reveals a pro-abortion zealot intent on using political authority to override state sovereignty in favor of extreme agendas,” the lawmakers wrote. They’re not mincing words here, and honestly, why should they? Bachelet served as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and Executive Director of UN Women. In both roles, she consistently pushed abortion as a fundamental right, attacking pro-life laws not just globally but specifically targeting American protections for the unborn.

This gets to the heart of something bigger than one nomination. It’s about whether international bureaucrats get to dictate moral policy to sovereign nations. Bachelet didn’t just advocate for abortion access. She actively worked to undermine countries with pro-life laws through what Republicans describe as intimidation and coercion. That’s not diplomacy. That’s ideological imperialism dressed up in human rights language.

President Trump already signaled where this administration stands when he pulled the United States out of UN Women in January. That wasn’t a symbolic gesture. It was a statement that America won’t fund organizations that treat abortion as if it’s some universal good rather than the taking of innocent life. Bachelet ran that very organization, using it as a platform for her agenda.

The timing matters too. With the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision returning abortion policy to the states, Americans are finally reclaiming sovereignty over life issues. Why would we then elevate someone to lead the UN who’s spent her career trying to strip that sovereignty away? It makes zero sense unless you’re content watching international bodies override the will of voters and state legislatures.

Bachelet’s supporters will paint this opposition as partisan obstruction. They’ll say she’s qualified, experienced, capable. Sure, she’s got credentials. But credentials without the right principles are just tools for advancing the wrong agenda. The question isn’t whether she can do the job. It’s what she’d do with it.

Republicans are betting Rubio understands what’s at stake. He’s not some career diplomat afraid to ruffle feathers. He knows the UN has long been hostile to conservative values, particularly on life issues. Blocking Bachelet sends a message that America won’t rubber stamp candidates who view abortion advocacy as a qualification rather than a disqualification.

Related: After Years of Madness, the Olympics Finally Remember What Female Means