Starbucks Billionaire Picks Florida Sunshine Over Washington’s New Wealth Grab

Howard Schultz just gave Washington state lawmakers a master class in consequences. The Starbucks founder announced he’s leaving Seattle for Miami after more than forty years building his empire in the Pacific Northwest. The timing? Impeccable. Washington legislators are racing to pass a millionaire tax that would slap nearly 10% on personal earnings over a million dollars before they adjourn Thursday.

Schultz didn’t explicitly blame the wealth tax in his LinkedIn post. He’s too savvy for that. Instead, he talked about sunshine and grandkids and retirement adventures. But everyone paying attention knows what’s happening here. When you’ve got $6.6 billion and lawmakers start eyeing your bank account like it’s a public piggy bank, you don’t need to write a manifesto explaining your departure. The message lands just fine.

This is what happens when politicians forget that wealthy people have options. They can move. And they will move. It’s not complicated. Florida has no personal income tax. Washington wants to take nearly 10% of high earners’ annual income. You don’t need an MBA to run those numbers.

The Democrats pushing this tax insist it’s about fairness and funding school meals and bridging budget shortfalls. Noble goals, sure. But here’s the thing about taxing the rich until they leave: eventually you run out of rich people to tax. California’s watching the same drama unfold with their proposed billionaire tax. Even Governor Gavin Newsom, hardly a conservative firebrand, warned it could trigger an exodus.

Washington state already taxes certain investment proceeds but doesn’t touch wages or salaries. That makes it one of the few Democrat-controlled states without a personal income tax. But apparently that wasn’t enough. The House just passed this millionaire levy after an all-night session, and Governor Bob Ferguson is ready to sign it the moment it hits his desk.

You know what’s fascinating? These lawmakers act shocked when productive citizens decide they’d rather not subsidize government spending sprees. Schultz built Starbucks into a global brand from Seattle. He created thousands of jobs. He generated billions in economic activity. And now the message from Olympia is basically: thanks for everything, now hand over more of your money so we can decide how to spend it better than you would.

The free market works because people respond to incentives. Tax something and you get less of it. That includes millionaires and billionaires who can afford really good accountants and really nice penthouses in Surfside, Florida. Schultz reportedly dropped $44 million on a five-bedroom ocean-view unit with a rooftop terrace. His private family office managing his finances? Already in Miami.

This isn’t just about one billionaire fleeing one state. It’s about a fundamental misunderstanding of how wealth creation works. Entrepreneurs and business builders don’t owe the government a blank check just because they succeeded. Limited government means respecting that people have the right to keep what they earn. It means understanding that confiscatory tax rates don’t promote opportunity or prosperity.

Washington lawmakers think they’re making taxation fairer by soaking the rich. What they’re actually doing is proving why conservative principles about limited government and free markets aren’t just ideology. They’re economic reality. People vote with their feet when government overreaches.

Schultz says his family foundation will stay in Seattle and he’ll always be grateful for the memories. That’s gracious. But his private office and his tax dollars are heading south. And honestly, who can blame him? When your state government views your success as their revenue stream rather than your achievement, it’s time to find a place that still values what you built.

The Washington legislature has until Thursday to finish this wealth grab. They’ll probably get it done. They’ll celebrate making the tax code fairer. And then in a few years they’ll wonder why more high earners followed Schultz’s lead. The answer will be staring them in the face, assuming they’re willing to look.

Related: Tim Scott’s New Bill Would Send School Money Directly to Parents When Teachers Walk Out