The Government’s War on Free Speech Just Got Knocked Down

They finally did it. After years of suspicion, mounting evidence, and legal warfare that dragged through multiple courts, the New Civil Liberties Alliance just forced the federal government to admit what conservatives have been screaming about since 2020. The Biden administration was running a censorship operation through Big Tech, and now there’s a consent decree to prove it.

The settlement in Missouri v. Biden isn’t some minor procedural victory. This is the kind of win that changes how government interacts with speech in America. Under the agreement, federal agencies like the CDC, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and the Office of the Surgeon General can no longer threaten or coerce Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, or YouTube over what content they allow. They can’t direct moderation decisions. They can’t veto what Americans say online. They’re out of the censorship business, at least officially.

You know what’s remarkable here? The case started with a hunch. Just regular Americans, people like Dr. Aaron Kheriaty and activist Jill Hines, who noticed something felt wrong about how quickly dissenting voices disappeared during COVID. They weren’t conspiracy theorists. They were people asking legitimate questions about lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and natural immunity who suddenly found themselves silenced. Turns out their suspicions weren’t paranoid at all.

Discovery in this case revealed something that should terrify anyone who values the First Amendment. Multiple federal agencies, senior officials, coordinated campaigns. This wasn’t some rogue staffer sending a couple emails. This was systemic. John Vecchione, senior litigation counsel with NCLA, put it plainly when he said freedom of speech has been powerfully preserved by their clients. He’s right, but let’s be honest about what that means. We came dangerously close to losing it.

The whole COVID era exposed something rotten in how our institutions operate. Remember when questioning the lab leak theory got you banned? When discussing vaccine side effects made you a dangerous spreader of misinformation? When suggesting kids didn’t need masks in schools turned you into a pariah? None of those positions were crazy. Many turned out to be correct or at least worthy of debate. But the government decided it knew better and enlisted Silicon Valley to enforce orthodoxy.

This isn’t about whether vaccines work or whether masks helped. This is about whether the government can deputize private companies to do what the Constitution explicitly forbids it from doing directly. The answer, thanks to this settlement, is no. They can’t. Not legally, anyway.

The timing here matters too. We’re in an era where trust in institutions has cratered, where half the country believes the media lies to them, where people genuinely don’t know what information they can trust anymore. That didn’t happen by accident. It happened because agencies that should have been transparent chose manipulation instead. They chose censorship over debate. They chose control over freedom.

Some will argue this settlement goes too far, that the government needs tools to combat genuine misinformation during emergencies. That’s the wrong framing. The government already has tools. It’s called speaking publicly, making its case, earning trust through transparency and honesty. What it doesn’t have, what it should never have, is the power to silence citizens who disagree.

The consent decree still needs final approval from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty, but barring something unexpected, this stands. Federal agencies will have to find new ways to communicate their messages without threatening the platforms that host American speech. They’ll have to persuade rather than coerce. Imagine that.

This case represents something larger than COVID policy or social media moderation. It’s about whether we still believe in the marketplace of ideas or whether we’ve decided some bureaucrat in Washington gets to referee what’s true. The Founders understood that free speech isn’t just about protecting popular opinions. It’s especially about protecting unpopular ones, dissenting ones, inconvenient ones.

The legal fight took multiple turns over several years, and honestly, it could have gone either way. Courts don’t always get these things right. But this time they did, or they’re about to. And that matters because the next crisis is coming. There will be another emergency, another moment when officials insist we need to restrict speech for the greater good. This settlement makes that harder. Not impossible, but harder.

Freedom doesn’t maintain itself. It requires people willing to fight for it, willing to endure being called names, willing to risk their reputations to stand up when institutions overstep. Dr. Kheriaty and Jill Hines did that. The NCLA did that. And now we all benefit from their refusal to sit down and shut up.

The Biden administration’s censorship campaign is finally dead. Let’s make sure it stays buried.

Related: Maryland Democrats Want Tampons in Men’s Bathrooms While the State Budget Bleeds Red