Allison Lyman’s son Connor Lopez is dead, and the person who killed him might walk away without so much as a permanent blemish on their record. Let that sink in for a moment. We’re not talking about a fender bender or a parking ticket. We’re talking about vehicular manslaughter, the kind of crime that ends one life and shatters dozens of others. But in Gavin Newsom’s California, that apparently doesn’t warrant lasting consequences.
This is what happens when ideology trumps common sense. When politicians decide that being “compassionate” means erasing accountability. Lyman believes the soft-on-crime laws passed during Newsom’s reign have created a system where drivers can kill someone on the road and then have that fatal accident scrubbed clean through diversion programs. It’s not justice. It’s negligence dressed up as progressive reform.
“You know, our hunch is this was all happening during ‘soft on crime,’ ‘let’s clear the jails,'” Lyman said. “And the consequence now is us, with these drivers right back on our roads.” She’s not wrong. The math is pretty simple here. When you remove consequences, you remove deterrence. When you remove deterrence, you get more of the behavior you claim to oppose.
California’s compounding layers of leniency have created something truly perverse. A driver charged with vehicular manslaughter can potentially emerge with both a clean criminal record and a spotless driving record. Think about that. The very documents that exist to warn others about dangerous behavior get wiped clean, as if Connor Lopez never existed. As if his death was just an unfortunate clerical error that needs correcting.
This isn’t about rehabilitation or second chances. Those concepts have their place, sure. But vehicular manslaughter isn’t shoplifting or vandalism. It’s the permanent elimination of a human life through reckless behavior behind the wheel of what is essentially a guided missile. There’s no bringing Connor back. No amount of diversion programs will reverse what happened on April 23 of last year.
The families calling for reform aren’t asking for blood. They’re asking for basic accountability, the kind that used to be a given in American jurisprudence. They’re asking that when someone’s negligence or recklessness kills another person, there’s a permanent record of that fact. Not because they’re vindictive, but because other people deserve to know. Future employers deserve to know. Future passengers in that person’s car deserve to know.
Newsom’s California has decided otherwise. In the rush to appear enlightened and merciful, the state has created a system where mercy flows exclusively in one direction. The person who caused the death gets leniency, diversion, a fresh start. The grieving mother gets nothing but the memory of her son and the knowledge that his death wasn’t significant enough to leave a lasting mark on the person responsible.
This is what limited government conservatives have been warning about for years. Not every problem requires a new program. Not every offender deserves a clean slate. Sometimes, consequences are appropriate. Sometimes, a record should follow you because what you did actually matters. The role of government isn’t to erase uncomfortable truths. It’s to maintain order and ensure justice, even when justice feels harsh.
Allison Lyman is living through every parent’s nightmare, made worse by a system that seems designed to minimize her loss. She’s watching California’s legal apparatus work overtime to protect her son’s killer from the lasting consequences of taking a life. And she’s speaking up, demanding that someone, anyone, acknowledge that this isn’t right. That her son’s death should mean something more than a checkbox on a diversion program form.
Related: Rep. Justin Pearson Physically Confronts State Trooper as Capitol Protest Erupts