Federal Judge Forces Biden’s Hand on Ghostwriter Recordings While Democrats Cry Privacy

Here’s what accountability looks like when it actually happens. A federal judge just told the Department of Justice they can’t hide behind privacy claims to protect Joe Biden from his own words. Judge Dabney Friedrich ruled Friday that the DOJ must hand over redacted versions of Biden’s conversations with his ghostwriter to the Heritage Foundation, and honestly, it’s about time someone called out this shell game.

The background matters here. Robert Hur, the special counsel who investigated Biden’s handling of classified materials after his vice presidency, found evidence that Biden “willfully retained” classified documents. Willfully. That’s not an oopsie. That’s not forgetting where you put your reading glasses. That’s a deliberate choice to keep materials you know you shouldn’t have. Yet Hur recommended no charges, which left a lot of Americans scratching their heads about whether we have one justice system or two.

The Heritage Foundation wasn’t satisfied with that outcome. They filed a Freedom of Information Act request seeking records from Hur’s investigation, because transparency isn’t supposed to be a partisan value. It’s supposed to be an American one. When the DOJ dragged its feet, Heritage sued. And Biden himself intervened in the lawsuit, claiming his privacy would be violated if these materials saw daylight.

You know what’s fascinating? Judge Friedrich actually reviewed the redacted materials herself. She didn’t just take the DOJ’s word for it or accept Biden’s privacy concerns at face value. She looked at what was actually there, and she found that the extensive redactions already applied by the DOJ completely undercut Biden’s claims. The judge wrote that “the privacy interests in this case, though substantial, are mitigated by the Department’s extensive redactions.” She noted the redacted materials contain no information about Biden’s family or other private persons.

So what exactly was Biden so worried about protecting? If it’s not about his family and the redactions are already extensive, what’s left is presumably his own words about his own actions regarding classified materials. That’s not private information. That’s public interest information of the highest order.

The judge understood this. She explicitly stated the information carries high public interest, which is legal speak for “the American people have a right to know.” When a former president and vice president potentially mishandled the nation’s secrets, we don’t get to hide behind privacy curtains. We get to see what happened.

Now, Friedrich did issue a temporary stay to allow for a potential appeal, which means the DOJ and Biden’s team will likely fight this all the way up the chain. That’s their right. But it’s also predictable as sunrise. Every time sunlight threatens to break through on this administration’s dealings, suddenly there’s another procedural delay, another appeal, another claim that transparency would somehow damage democracy rather than strengthen it.

The contrast with how other political figures get treated when classified documents enter the conversation is stark. We’ve seen raids. We’ve seen wall-to-wall coverage. We’ve seen prosecutions pursued with remarkable vigor. But when it comes to Biden’s classified materials, suddenly everyone’s worried about privacy and proportionality and whether we really need to be so aggressive about enforcing rules that exist for good reason.

Limited government means government that’s accountable to the people it serves. It means transparency isn’t optional when public officials make decisions that affect national security. The Heritage Foundation did what conservative organizations do best when they’re functioning properly. They demanded accountability through legal channels. They used the tools the system provides. They didn’t burn anything down or occupy anything. They filed paperwork and made their case in court.

And they won. At least for now. Whether that victory survives the inevitable appeals remains to be seen, but the fact that a federal judge looked at the evidence and sided with transparency over executive privilege tells you something important about the merits of this case.

Related: GOP Lawmaker Steps In After School Board Attacks Deployed Service Member