Trump’s Intelligence Pick With No Intel Background Begins Mass Firings at ODNI

Bill Pulte walked into the Office of the Director of National Intelligence last Friday and immediately started doing exactly what President Trump hired him to do. Fire people. Lots of them.

By Monday, his second full day running one of America’s most sensitive intelligence operations, the pink slips were already flying. Sources close to the matter confirm that Pulte has begun cutting jobs at ODNI, with the National Counterterrorism Center expected to take a particularly brutal hit. The exact number of terminated employees remains unclear, but this isn’t some gentle reorganization. This is the downsizing Trump explicitly demanded, carried out by a man whose primary qualification appears to be unwavering loyalty to the president.

Let’s be clear about something. Pulte has zero intelligence experience. None. What he does have is a track record of launching investigations into Trump’s political enemies, including Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, New York Attorney General Letitia James, Senator Adam Schiff, and former Representative Eric Swalwell. They’ve all denied wrongdoing, naturally. But that’s beside the point. Pulte’s job wasn’t to bring expertise to the intelligence community. His job was to be “less shackled,” as Trump himself described it to The Wall Street Journal.

You know what’s remarkable here? The president said the quiet part out loud. He wanted someone unencumbered by the usual constraints of government service, someone who could “execute the immediate and needed downsizing” without getting bogged down in bureaucratic niceties or institutional knowledge. Trump told reporters he wouldn’t mind if cuts were made. He said ODNI’s size has been “way too high for way too long.”

Now, there’s a legitimate conservative argument buried somewhere in this mess. The federal bureaucracy has bloated beyond recognition. Agencies multiply, staff expands, and taxpayers foot the bill for operations that often duplicate efforts or serve questionable purposes. Limited government isn’t just a talking point. It’s a principle worth defending when agencies grow fat and complacent on the public dime.

But here’s where things get complicated. The intelligence community isn’t the Department of Agriculture. These aren’t paper pushers shuffling farm subsidy applications. The National Counterterrorism Center, reportedly facing severe cuts, exists because nineteen terrorists hijacked four planes on September 11, 2001. It was created specifically to connect dots that agencies failed to connect before nearly three thousand Americans died. Strong national defense requires strong intelligence capabilities. You can’t have one without the other.

The timing raises eyebrows too. Trump had nominated Jay Clayton, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, to permanently lead ODNI. Then he abruptly halted Clayton’s confirmation process until his replacement, Jamie McDonald, gets confirmed first. So Pulte remains in the acting role, wielding a chainsaw through an agency he knew nothing about ten days ago.

And let’s talk about collateral damage. Pulte’s appointment directly caused the lapse of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. That’s the legal framework allowing federal authorities to collect communications of foreigners abroad without a warrant. It’s a critical tool for monitoring threats before they materialize on American soil. But it expired because Pulte’s appointment created such chaos that Congress couldn’t navigate the political minefield to reauthorize it.

The conservative position should prioritize national security above all else. Free markets matter. Individual liberty matters. But none of it means anything if we can’t protect our citizens from genuine threats. Downsizing bloated agencies makes sense. Gutting counterterrorism capabilities while global threats multiply does not.

There’s also something deeply troubling about installing someone whose claim to fame involves investigating the president’s political opponents. That’s not draining the swamp. That’s redirecting the swamp’s resources toward personal vendettas. Republicans spent years rightly criticizing the weaponization of federal agencies under previous administrations. You can’t suddenly celebrate it when your guy does it.

The intelligence community needs reform. It needs accountability. It probably needs fewer people doing redundant work. But reform requires understanding what you’re reforming. It requires distinguishing between wasteful bureaucracy and essential operations. Pulte has been on the job for two days. He doesn’t know which is which yet. Nobody could.

Trump’s frustration with the intelligence apparatus is understandable. The Russia investigation, the constant leaks, the resistance from career officials who disagreed with his policies. All legitimate grievances. But the solution to politicized intelligence isn’t more politicization in the opposite direction. It’s depoliticization entirely.

The president deserves appointees who share his vision and will execute his agenda. That’s how representative government works. But intelligence work demands expertise alongside loyalty. You need people who understand threats, know how collection works, and can separate signal from noise in a world drowning in information. Enthusiasm and political alignment don’t substitute for knowledge when lives hang in the balance.

We’ll see how many jobs Pulte cuts and whether America’s security posture weakens as a result. The test won’t come in press releases or political speeches. It’ll come when something slips through the cracks because the people who might have caught it were fired on day two.

Related: FBI Deputy Director Explains the Call to Move Forward With Trump’s UFC Event