A Grieving Mother Just Asked Sanctuary Politicians the One Question They Can’t Answer

Jessica Gorman stood before Congress Tuesday and asked the kind of question that doesn’t get asked enough in Washington. The kind that cuts through talking points and political theater. The kind that demands you look another human being in the eye and justify your choices.

Her daughter Sheridan was eighteen years old. A college freshman at Loyola University. The kind of kid who used to stake out the “buddy bench” at recess, waiting for lonely classmates who needed a friend. She went to the Chicago lakefront in March with friends to see the Northern Lights. She never came home.

The man charged with killing her is Jose Medina, an illegal immigrant from Venezuela who shouldn’t have been in this country at all. He’d been arrested before. Had an outstanding warrant. And yet there he was, walking the streets of Chicago, free to end a young woman’s life because someone somewhere decided that cooperation with ICE was too politically inconvenient.

Jessica Gorman wants to know why.

She delivered testimony at a House Judiciary subcommittee hearing on sanctuary policies, and she didn’t mince words. “I want you to imagine that was your daughter, not mine,” she told the lawmakers. “What if she was yours?”

It’s the question that should haunt every politician who’s ever championed sanctuary city policies while hiding behind carefully crafted talking points about compassion and community trust. You want to talk about compassion? Tell that to a mother burying her child. You want to talk about trust? Explain why American citizens should trust leaders who prioritize the comfort of criminal illegal immigrants over their safety.

Gorman invoked that buddy bench story with purpose. Her daughter spent her whole life making others feel seen, helping people who felt left out. And the people responsible for protecting her failed. “I think Congress needs one,” Gorman said about the buddy bench. “Yes, I think every governor, every mayor, every sanctuary city official and politician shifting blame and interest, hiding behind their slogans and talking points should have to all sit on one.”

Then she issued her challenge. Sit down with me, she told them. Take my hand. Look me in the eye. “Explain why people here illegally matter more than your American citizens. Explain why sanctuary policies matter more than my Sheridan’s life. Explain why cooperation with ICE was too much to ask for, but asking our American parents to bury our children is somehow acceptable.”

Nobody answered her. Not really. Because how do you answer that?

The Democrats at the hearing offered their usual defense. Sanctuary policies preserve trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement, they said. It’s a familiar argument, one that sounds reasonable until you actually think about it. We’re supposed to believe that protecting criminal illegal immigrants from deportation somehow makes communities safer. That a city refusing to cooperate with federal immigration authorities is actually looking out for its residents.

Tell that to the Gorman family.

Republicans argued what should be obvious to anyone paying attention. These policies allow criminal illegal immigrants to be released back into communities instead of being turned over to ICE. They create a protective shield around people who’ve already proven they don’t respect our laws. And American citizens pay the price.

Documents show that Biden border officials released Medina due to lack of space. Lack of space. That’s the excuse. We don’t have room to detain people who enter our country illegally, so we just let them go and hope for the best. Sheridan Gorman is dead because someone decided lack of space was an acceptable reason to release a criminal back onto American streets.

This isn’t complicated. A young woman with her whole life ahead of her went to see the Northern Lights and got shot by someone who had no right to be here. Someone who’d already committed crimes. Someone who could have been detained, deported, removed from the equation entirely. But sanctuary policies got in the way. Political posturing got in the way. And now an eighteen-year-old college freshman is gone forever.

Jessica Gorman made sure Congress heard Sheridan’s story. Not Medina’s. Sheridan’s. Because that’s who matters here. That’s who should have mattered to the politicians running Chicago. The innocent American citizen with a heart full of compassion and a head full of dreams.

Every sanctuary city official should have to answer Jessica Gorman’s question. Every politician who’s ever voted for these policies should have to sit across from a parent who’s buried their child and explain why illegal immigrants deserve more protection than American citizens. They should have to look that parent in the eye and justify their priorities.

They won’t, of course. It’s easier to hide behind abstractions about community policing and immigrant rights. Easier to avoid the human cost of these decisions. Easier to pretend that opposing sanctuary policies is somehow cruel or uncompassionate, as if there’s anything more cruel than telling parents their child’s death was an acceptable price for political ideology.

Sheridan Gorman mattered. Her life had value. Her dreams deserved protection. And the people responsible for providing that protection failed her completely. That’s the story. That’s what Jessica Gorman wants Congress to understand. Not the excuses, not the talking points. Just the simple, devastating truth that her daughter should still be alive.

Related: The B-2 Spirit Can Now Sink Warships and Beijing Should Be Worried