Mike DeWine just stepped in it, and honestly, he should’ve seen this coming from a mile away. The Ohio governor, a Republican in a state that went hard for Trump, decided to plant his flag on the side of keeping 30,000 Haitian migrants in his state rather than supporting the president’s order to end their Temporary Protected Status. His reasoning? Haiti is hell, so we can’t possibly send them back there.

Let’s pause on that for a second. The governor of Ohio just admitted on national television that an entire country is hellish, then in the same breath argued we should keep importing people from that hellish place. You can practically hear the logic breaking down in real time.

DeWine told CBS that very few Haitians would voluntarily return to their homeland. They want to work, he said. They want to support their families. They’ll just go somewhere else if forced to leave Ohio. It’s a remarkably candid admission that reveals the entire game. This isn’t about temporary protection anymore. It never was. It’s about permanent resettlement, and everyone knows it except apparently the people still pretending TPS means what those three letters actually stand for.

The backlash was swift and merciless. Sean Davis from The Federalist asked the question everyone was thinking: what exactly makes Haiti hellish? Is it the weather? The geography? Or could it possibly be the governance, the culture, the systems created and maintained by Haitians themselves? It’s the kind of question that makes people uncomfortable because it forces us to confront a truth we’re not supposed to say out loud.

Logan Hall from The Blaze echoed the sentiment. If Haiti is so terrible, why are we importing Haitians? It’s not cruel to ask this. It’s common sense. The entire premise of immigration policy should be selecting people who will improve America, not simply relocating populations from failed states while pretending we’re not allowed to ask why those states failed in the first place.

Here’s what really grinds my gears about DeWine’s position. He’s essentially arguing for a one-way ratchet where any designation of temporary protection becomes permanent residency by default. The moment conditions get bad somewhere, we grant TPS. Then when it’s time to reassess, we’re told conditions are still bad so we can’t possibly end it. Rinse and repeat for decades. Meanwhile, “temporary” becomes a polite fiction we all pretend to believe.

This is exactly the kind of establishment Republican thinking that drove voters into Trump’s arms in the first place. The base is tired of leaders who campaign on immigration enforcement, then go squishy the moment there’s any pushback. DeWine won his state while Trump won it too, but only one of them seems to remember what voters actually want.

The governor claims these migrants want to work and support their families. Great. Lots of people around the world want that. We have a legal immigration system for exactly that purpose. What we don’t have is an obligation to provide permanent refuge to anyone from any country experiencing hardship, especially when temporary was supposed to mean temporary.

The online response wasn’t just criticism. It was mockery, the kind that stings because it exposes the absurdity of the underlying position. When your argument boils down to “their country is terrible so they can never leave ours,” you’ve already lost the plot. You’ve admitted you’re not enforcing immigration law. You’re just managing decline and hoping nobody notices the contradiction.

DeWine will probably weather this storm. Establishment Republicans usually do. But the gap between what GOP voters want and what GOP governors deliver just keeps growing wider, and moments like this make it crystal clear why that frustration exists.

Related: Fauci Takes the Fifth and Rand Paul Finally Gets What He Wanted All Along