The DOJ Spied on Congress and Nobody Seems Shocked Enough

Richard Blumenthal isn’t exactly your typical Republican ally. The Connecticut Democrat has spent years as one of the left’s most reliable votes, a stalwart defender of progressive causes who rarely breaks ranks. So when he tells you that Republicans have a legitimate beef with how the Justice Department conducted itself under Jack Smith’s watch, you better pay attention.

“Republicans are rightly concerned about the possible breach of norms and improper access to email,” Blumenthal said this week. Those words should ring like a fire alarm in every American’s ears, regardless of party affiliation. Because what we’re talking about here isn’t some technical violation of bureaucratic protocol. We’re talking about the federal government spying on members of Congress.

The Senate Judiciary Committee dropped a document dump Tuesday that reveals Smith’s investigation into President Trump swept up text messages from 44 members of Congress. Forty-four. Democrats and Republicans alike, their private communications with White House staff vacuumed up in the name of investigating January 6th and those classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. The DOJ just helped itself to congressional communications like it was browsing a buffet line.

You know what’s remarkable about this moment? The silence. Where’s the outrage from the civil liberties crowd that spent years howling about government overreach during the Patriot Act debates? Where are the constitutional scholars who lecture us endlessly about separation of powers? Crickets, mostly. Because when the target is Trump, apparently all bets are off and the rulebook gets tossed in the shredder.

This isn’t about defending Trump’s conduct or dismissing legitimate investigations. It’s about recognizing that the ends don’t justify the means, especially when those means involve the Justice Department treating elected representatives like suspects in a drug cartel. Congress exists as a co-equal branch of government precisely to check executive power. That relationship requires trust, boundaries, and yes, a certain degree of separation. When prosecutors start monitoring lawmakers’ private communications without their knowledge, those boundaries collapse.

The whole episode reveals something darker about how power works in modern Washington. There’s this assumption among certain bureaucratic circles that they’re the adults in the room, that their judgment supersedes democratic accountability. They convince themselves that protecting democracy sometimes requires undermining it, that saving the republic means surveilling its elected officials. It’s a dangerous mindset that leads to exactly this kind of abuse.

Blumenthal’s willingness to break with his party on this matter suggests even some Democrats recognize they’re standing on shaky ground. He’s calling for more facts, which is reasonable enough. But the facts we already have are pretty damning. The Justice Department collected communications from sitting members of Congress as part of a politically charged investigation. That’s not speculation or conspiracy theory. That’s documented reality.

The free market of ideas only functions when government keeps its thumb off the scale. Limited government isn’t just some abstract principle conservatives toss around at cocktail parties. It’s the essential safeguard against exactly this type of institutional arrogance. When federal prosecutors believe they have the authority to monitor Congress itself, we’ve crossed a line that should terrify everyone.

Smith’s defenders will argue he was just following evidence wherever it led, doing his job with prosecutorial zeal. Fine. But zeal without restraint is just another word for fanaticism. And fanaticism in service of political investigations is how republics die, slowly and then all at once.

This scandal deserves more than Blumenthal’s cautious acknowledgment. It deserves a full accounting, consequences for those who authorized this surveillance, and ironclad reforms to prevent it from happening again. Because if Congress won’t defend its own institutional prerogatives, who will?

Related: West Virginia Congressman Calls H-1B Visa Program a Scam Against American Workers