Something remarkable happened in Massachusetts last month, and it wasn’t the governor signing yet another progressive bill into law. It was nine Democrats standing up and saying no.

Governor Maura Healey signed the Prioritizing Patient Access to Care Act on August 10, surrounded by grinning supporters who clapped like she’d just cured cancer. What she actually did was eliminate the state’s 24-week abortion limit and greenlight terminations right up until birth. The bill passed the state House 119-33, but here’s what matters: nine Democrats joined Republicans in voting against it. In a state as blue as Massachusetts, that’s not just noteworthy. It’s a crack in the foundation.

Representative Jeffrey Turco from Winthrop didn’t mince words. He called the law “barbaric” and “extremist.” Think about that for a second. A Democrat using those terms about his own party’s legislation. Turco pointed out what should alarm anyone regardless of party: the bill was rushed through in two weeks without real public input. That’s not democracy. That’s ramming through an agenda before people can object.

The previous law already had exceptions for the mother’s life and fatal fetal diagnoses after 24 weeks. This wasn’t about protecting women in crisis. This was about ideology dressed up as healthcare.

Representative Chris Markey of Dartmouth said the law creates a slippery slope and puts doctors in an impossible ethical position. He’s right to worry. When you tell physicians they have complete discretion to perform late-term abortions for any reason, you’re not giving them freedom. You’re giving them a burden that conflicts with centuries of medical ethics. First, do no harm starts to sound pretty hollow when a healthy baby at 39 weeks can be legally terminated.

Markey made another crucial point: you can be pro-choice and still recognize this goes too far. That’s the conversation America needs to have but keeps avoiding. Most Americans support some access to abortion early in pregnancy. Most Americans also recoil at the idea of ending a viable life days before birth. These aren’t contradictory positions. They’re common sense trying to break through partisan noise.

Representative Dennis Gallagher struggled with the bill precisely because he supports abortion being between a woman and her doctor. But at a certain point, we’re not talking about a clump of cells. We’re talking about a baby who could survive outside the womb. When the mother’s health is fine and the baby’s health is fine, why isn’t adoption the answer we’re promoting? It’s a fair question that deserves better than dismissive slogans.

Representative Alan Silvia, a pro-life Democrat, cut to the heart of the matter with brutal honesty. We bend over backwards to save whales and protect stray animals, but when it comes to human life in the womb, suddenly all that compassion evaporates. The cognitive dissonance is staggering. We’ll pass laws to protect eagle eggs but celebrate unrestricted abortion until birth. Make it make sense.

Massachusetts now joins ten other states and Washington DC in allowing abortion throughout all nine months of pregnancy. That’s not progress. That’s not even mainstream pro-choice policy. It’s radical by any reasonable measure, and polls consistently show most Americans oppose third-trimester abortions except in genuine medical emergencies.

The speed at which this passed should concern everyone. Two weeks from introduction to passage. No real public hearings. No substantive debate. Just a legislative sprint to get it done before opposition could organize. That’s not how you pass good law. That’s how you pass law you know won’t survive scrutiny.

These nine Democrats deserve credit for standing on principle when it would’ve been easier to stay quiet and vote with their party. Political courage looks like this: knowing you’ll face backlash from your own side and doing the right thing anyway. Turco, Markey, Gallagher, Silvia, and their colleagues saw this bill for what it was and refused to go along.

The broader lesson here matters beyond Massachusetts. When elected officials from the party pushing legislation call it barbaric and extremist, maybe it’s time to pump the brakes. When lawmakers who support abortion rights say a bill goes too far, that’s not Republican talking points. That’s an internal warning signal that something’s gone wrong.

We can have honest conversations about reproductive rights without pretending there aren’t legitimate concerns about when life deserves protection. We can support women facing impossible choices without celebrating the elimination of all restrictions. And we can recognize that sometimes your own party loses its way, and speaking up takes more guts than going along.

Those nine Democrats in Massachusetts just showed us what that looks like.

Related: Thomas Reveals Which Universities Won’t Have Him and the Truth Stings