Newsom Poised to Sign Bill Making Islamic Holidays Official State Recognition

California’s legislature just fast-tracked a bill that would formally recognize two Islamic holidays and give state workers the option to take them off. Assembly Bill 2017 sailed through the Assembly with a 64-1 vote back in May and now sits waiting for final Senate approval before landing on Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk. If it passes, Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha would join the roster of holidays acknowledged in state law.

Here’s what that actually means. State employees could use their existing paid holiday credits to observe these days. Public schools and community colleges would have the green light to close entirely if they choose. Democratic Assemblymember Matt Haney from San Francisco, who authored the bill, says it’s about recognition and respect for California’s Muslim community. No student should have to pick between faith and attendance, he argues. No worker should feel torn between religious observance and professional obligations.

You know what strikes me about this? The language. “Their traditions deserve recognition and respect,” Haney said in March. It’s the kind of statement that sounds perfectly reasonable on its surface. And maybe it is reasonable. California does have a significant Muslim population. But let’s not pretend this exists in a vacuum.

We live in a country founded on Judeo-Christian principles, where Christmas and Easter have been woven into our cultural fabric for centuries. Those holidays didn’t need legislative champions or advocacy groups pushing for their recognition. They were simply part of who we were as a nation. Now we’re watching a deliberate reshaping of that foundation, dressed up in the language of equality and inclusion.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations celebrated the bill’s progress. Their California legislative director, Oussama Mokeddem, called it “a meaningful step toward ensuring Muslim students can celebrate Eid with the same dignity, respect, and accommodation afforded to other faith communities.” There’s that word again. Accommodation. It’s become the Swiss Army knife of progressive policy language, justifying everything from curriculum changes to workplace restructuring.

I’m not suggesting Muslims shouldn’t be able to practice their faith freely. Religious liberty is a cornerstone of conservative thought. The First Amendment protects that right, and it should. But there’s a difference between protecting someone’s right to worship and actively promoting religious observances through state recognition and institutional closures.

Think about the schools for a moment. Public schools could close for these holidays. That means taxpayer-funded institutions might shut down to observe Islamic holy days. Meanwhile, Christian students and teachers navigate an increasingly secular educational environment where even saying “Merry Christmas” can spark administrative hand-wringing. The asymmetry is hard to miss.

Hala Hijazi, founder of the Muslim Impact Council, shared her story of missing Eid celebrations while working for San Francisco years ago. “It was really painful to not be with my family,” she told the Sacramento Bee. That’s genuinely difficult, and I don’t dismiss that pain. But millions of Americans make similar sacrifices every year. They work holidays. They miss family gatherings. They juggle competing demands between faith, work, and personal life. That’s part of living in a pluralistic society with diverse traditions.

The bill’s supporters frame this as equity. If Christians get Christmas off, why shouldn’t Muslims get their holy days? It sounds fair. But it ignores the reality that America’s cultural calendar developed organically over centuries, reflecting the religious convictions of the overwhelming majority. We’re not talking about denying anyone their rights. We’re talking about whether government should actively reshape cultural norms to accommodate every religious tradition equally.

Limited government means government shouldn’t be in the business of picking and choosing which religious observances to officially recognize beyond what’s already established. Once you start down that road, where does it end? Do we recognize Hindu holidays next? Buddhist observances? Pagan celebrations? Each decision requires more bureaucracy, more accommodation, more institutional reshaping.

California is racing toward the end of its legislative session on Monday. If the Senate passes AB 2017, it goes to Newsom. Given his track record and the overwhelming Assembly support, he’ll probably sign it. Then California will join a small number of states formally recognizing Islamic holidays, and we’ll hear about how progressive and inclusive that makes them.

But inclusion that comes through government mandate isn’t organic cultural evolution. It’s social engineering with a friendly face. And conservatives ought to recognize it for what it is.

Related: RFK Jr. Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About Why America Butchered Its Kids