The Wisconsin Supreme Court has opened an investigation into former Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan, who could lose her law license entirely after a jury convicted her of felony obstruction for helping an illegal immigrant slip past federal immigration officers. The probe follows a formal complaint filed by the Center to Advance Security in America, and honestly, it’s about time someone asked the hard questions about accountability in our judicial system.

Here’s what happened back in April 2025. ICE officers showed up at the courthouse to arrest Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, an illegal immigrant facing three counts of battery, domestic abuse, and infliction of physical pain or injury. Not exactly a model citizen, right? But instead of allowing federal law enforcement to do their job, Judge Dugan became what authorities described as “visibly angry.” She called the situation “absurd” and then did something that still boggles the mind. She actively obstructed justice.

Dugan sent the ICE officers on a wild goose chase to the chief judge’s chambers while simultaneously instructing Flores-Ruiz to escape through a “jury door” leading to a nonpublic area of the courthouse. Think about that for a second. A sitting judge, someone sworn to uphold the law, deliberately helped a criminal alien evade federal law enforcement. The ICE agents eventually caught up with him outside after a foot chase, but the damage was done.

The jury didn’t buy whatever justification Dugan offered. They found her guilty of felony obstruction in December. You’d think that would be the moment for some reflection, maybe a little remorse. But according to CASA’s complaint, Dugan has “shockingly” failed to express any regret for her actions. During her sentencing hearing in July, she even said she hoped to one day return to public service. The audacity is breathtaking.

Federal sentencing guidelines recommended between 15 and 21 months behind bars. She got a $5,000 fine instead. No prison time whatsoever. Curtis Schube, CASA’s Director of Research and Policy, isn’t letting this slide. He’s pushing for full accountability, and he’s right to do so. “ICE is a branch of federal law enforcement,” Schube noted. “To hinder ICE’s ability to enforce the United States’ immigration code is no different than hindering a police or FBI investigation.”

That’s the crux of it, isn’t it? We’ve reached a point where some judges apparently believe their personal political preferences trump federal law. This isn’t about compassion or progressive values. It’s about a fundamental misunderstanding of what it means to serve on the bench. Judges don’t get to pick which laws they’ll enforce based on their feelings that morning.

The immigration debate in this country is already complicated enough without members of the judiciary actively sabotaging enforcement efforts. You want to change immigration law? Fine. Run for Congress. Lobby your representatives. Write op-eds. But when you’re wearing the robe, you enforce the law as written. That’s not conservative ideology talking. That’s basic civics.

What makes this case particularly galling is Dugan’s complete lack of accountability even after conviction. The Wisconsin Supreme Court investigation could lead to disbarment, and given the circumstances, it probably should. Being unfit to serve as a judge certainly raises questions about fitness to practice law at all. The legal profession requires integrity, respect for the rule of law, and understanding that personal beliefs don’t override legal obligations.

This case matters beyond Milwaukee County. It’s a test of whether our system can hold its own members accountable when they go rogue. Every time a judge gets away with this kind of behavior, it emboldens others who might be tempted to substitute their judgment for the law itself. That’s not justice. That’s judicial activism at its most dangerous.

Related: Cruz Raises Alarm Over El-Sayed Senate Bid and Potential Terrorism Risk