An unfortunate occurrence has taken place at Cambodia’s noted Angkor Wat temple complex, a UNESCO site of immense significance. On a late Friday afternoon, lightning struck, killing three individuals and injuring several others who were seeking refuge near the main temple.
Reports indicate that video footage circulated on social media depicts two ambulances arriving at the scene, with bystanders and site officials assisting the injured. Images also reveal multiple victims receiving medical treatment at a local hospital.
The incident prompted a response from Cambodia’s Minister of Tourism, Hout Hak. In an official statement, the Minister urged individuals to refrain from posting about the tragic incident online, voicing concern that such “negative information” might damage the nation’s tourism sector.
As of now, authorities have not released any further details about the incident. However, according to reliable sources who wished to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the situation, the three fatalities were all Cambodian.

The Cambodian Red Cross, too, has confirmed its involvement, stating it has provided aid packages to the families of two victims, a man aged 34 and a woman aged 52. Further comments from the Red Cross have not been forthcoming.
The Angkor Wat site, internationally recognized and featured on Cambodia’s national flag, is a major tourist attraction, drawing an estimated 2.5 million visitors annually. This sprawling archaeological jewel, covering approximately 400 square kilometers (155 square miles), holds the remnants of Khmer Empire capitals from the 9th to the 15th centuries and is considered one of Southeast Asia’s most critical archaeological sites.
Despite the government’s efforts to develop the area further, including the inauguration of a new $1.1 billion China-funded airport in nearby Siem Reap, it has faced criticism from human rights groups for relocating around 10,000 families from the Angkor Wat area to a new settlement. Both UNESCO and Amnesty International have expressed their concerns, questioning the voluntary nature of these relocations.