There’s a playbook in Washington, and it’s getting worn at the edges from overuse. When federal investigators start circling, when the questions get uncomfortable, when the paperwork doesn’t quite add up, there’s one name that keeps appearing on speed dial. Abbe Lowell has become the legal equivalent of that emergency contact you only call when things have gone sideways.
Gavin Newsom just made that call.
The California governor and his wife Jennifer Siebel Newsom have retained Lowell, the same attorney who spent considerable time trying to keep Hunter Biden out of federal prison. If you’re wondering whether that signals confidence or concern, well, you don’t hire Washington’s most expensive defense attorney because everything’s peachy. You hire him because you need someone who knows how to navigate the kind of scrutiny that can end careers.
Two separate federal investigations have emerged from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of California. One involves tax-related matters connected to Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s nonprofit and filmmaking work. The other already claimed a victim when Dana Williamson, Newsom’s former chief of staff, pleaded guilty in a separate federal fraud case. According to CalMatters, both investigations originated from whistleblowers and people in Sacramento, not from some Mar-a-Lago vendetta list.
That last detail matters, though Newsom would prefer you ignore it. The governor has been vocal about dismissing the scrutiny as a politically motivated fishing expedition orchestrated by President Trump. It’s a convenient narrative. Trump’s a visible target, and positioning yourself as his victim plays well with the base. But here’s the thing about fishing expeditions. Sometimes they actually catch fish.
Lowell’s client roster reads like a who’s who of people with serious legal problems. Hunter Biden, Bob Menendez, John Edwards. He’s also represented Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, which tells you something about his bipartisan appeal when the heat’s on. The man served as House Democrats’ chief minority counsel during Bill Clinton’s impeachment. He knows how to work both sides of the aisle when a paycheck’s involved.
What’s interesting is the timing. These investigations didn’t materialize out of thin air the moment Trump returned to office. The fraud case involving Williamson grew out of an investigation launched during the Biden administration. That complicates Newsom’s preferred storyline considerably. You can’t blame Trump for investigations that started when his predecessor was still picking out new Oval Office furniture.
Jennifer Siebel Newsom dodged questions about her husband’s presidential aspirations at a Friday event, saying they were focused on California and saving democracy. Saving democracy has become the go-to phrase when you don’t want to answer uncomfortable questions. It’s political comfort food, vague enough to mean everything and nothing simultaneously.
The nonprofit sector has become a convenient vehicle for political families to blend advocacy, personal brand building, and financial arrangements that would raise eyebrows in any other context. When you’re the first partner of California and running a nonprofit while also doing filmmaking work, the lines between personal income, charitable mission, and political influence can get blurry fast. Tax authorities tend to notice when those lines disappear entirely.
Newsom confirmed hiring Lowell during a Tuesday news conference, which is about as much detail as he’s willing to provide. Meanwhile, Lowell didn’t respond to questions before publication, which tracks. High-powered attorneys don’t get paid to chat with reporters about ongoing investigations.
The pattern here is familiar to anyone who’s watched California politics. Deny, deflect, blame Trump, hire the best lawyer money can buy, then wait for the news cycle to move on. Sometimes it works. Sometimes federal prosecutors don’t care about news cycles.
What we’re watching is either a legitimate investigation into financial impropriety or the weaponization of federal law enforcement against political opponents. Those are the only two options, and which one you believe probably depends on whether you think Newsom should be president someday or imprisoned. There’s not much middle ground left in American politics.
But if this really is just a baseless witch hunt, you’d think the governor would be eager to provide documentation proving his innocence rather than lawyering up with the same attorney who represented the president’s son through multiple federal indictments. Innocent people can hire lawyers too, sure. But they usually don’t need Abbe Lowell.
Related: Virginia’s Sanctuary Policies Just Got a Toddler Killed