How do you define “over the top”?
Madison Avenue’s evil geniuses are able to create any kind of advertising they like. Modern advertising is constantly trying to “break barriers” and take people “out of there comfort zones” to sell products.
What about children in bondage costumes holding teddy bears and children with sexy outfits? This is child pornography.
the brand “Balenciaga” just did a uh….. interesting… photoshoot for their new products recently which included a very purposely poorly hidden court document about ‘virtual child porn’
normal stuff pic.twitter.com/zjMN5WhZ0s
— shoe (@shoe0nhead) November 21, 2022
Daily Caller:
Online photos show a child sitting on a couch and holding a purple bear teddy bear. The bear was wearing a Bondage outfit with leather straps around its neck and ruffled straps to its thighs. Another photo shows the child holding a second bondage bear while standing in front of a Balenciaga display. The child was wearing a mesh shirt with leather straps at his wrists and ankles. It was wearing a choker around its neck.
The photo also features a purse atop papers that include a copy of a Supreme Court decision that defines pornography for children.
“But, wait! ”
June Nicole Lapine, YouTuber behind “Shoe”, is accused of creating a mountain out of a molehill.
Lapine highlights Balenciaga’s new Objects collection. She begins her case by incorrectly linking the campaign with photos promoting the label’s collaboration with Adidas. Lapine builds her case when she incorrectly links the campaign to photos promoting the label’s partnership with Adidas.
This is not a crime against taste. This exposes deep cynicism, which separates civilized society’s creators.
Balenciaga’s decision not to remove its Instagram account was part of a larger conspiracy. Balenciaga’s decision to delete its Instagram account is part of a “wider conspiracy.”
A purse that sits on top of a SCOTUS decision regarding child pornography is another ad campaign. Balenciaga seems obsessed with child pornography.
“A wider conspiracy is irrelevant.” “What about the children? “
