The New York Times published a piece Sunday that perfectly encapsulates the mainstream media’s refusal to acknowledge basic distinctions between victims and perpetrators when illegal immigration is involved.

The article tells the story of two men, Dan Kluver and Romeo Pérez-Bravo, presenting them as dual victims of circumstance. Here are the facts: Kluver is an American citizen from Minnesota who coaches baseball, works at a factory, and teaches Sunday school. According to the Times’ own reporting, he had “never fired a gun, or smoked a cigarette, or missed a payment, or been arrested.” Pérez-Bravo is a Guatemalan national who entered the country illegally, stole Kluver’s identity, racked up multiple DUIs, accumulated massive tax debt in Kluver’s name, and fatally struck a grandfather with his vehicle.

One of these men is a victim. The other is a criminal. This is not complicated.

Yet the Times insists on framing Pérez-Bravo as someone merely living under “borrowed identities” and desperate to “fix” the mess he created. Borrowed identities. As if Pérez-Bravo stumbled upon Kluver’s Social Security number lying on the sidewalk and decided to hold onto it for safekeeping.

The real story here is the systematic destruction of an American citizen’s life through identity theft, compounded by government incompetence and a broken immigration system that fails to protect Americans from precisely this kind of fraud.

For years, Kluver received stray letters about wages earned in unfamiliar towns and collection notices for debt that was not his. He hired tax specialists. He drove to government offices across Minnesota. He ran into bureaucratic dead ends at every turn. The situation escalated when Kluver was pulled over and informed his license was suspended due to offenses he never committed.

The financial damage was staggering. Some years, Pérez-Bravo earned more than Kluver’s own salary at a sugar beet factory, pushing the total income under Kluver’s Social Security number into a higher tax bracket. The debt mounted. Kluver filed complaints with authorities, but his report “landed in a pile along with tens of thousands of similar reports filed each year.”

While Kluver waited for relief that never came, the IRS docked his annual tax returns and garnished his paychecks, costing him thousands of dollars. His then-fiancée emptied her savings to pay off the debt, sending the government a check for six thousand dollars in 2012.

The relief lasted exactly one tax season. The following year, the Kluvers received a new bill for twenty-two thousand dollars, again because of Pérez-Bravo’s activities under the stolen identity.

The Kluvers spent the next decade dealing with annual tax audits, budgets that never balanced, and the strain that financial chaos places on a marriage and family.

This is not a story about two victims. This is a story about one American citizen whose life was systematically destroyed by an illegal alien who repeatedly broke the law, and a government that proved utterly incapable of protecting that citizen or rectifying the situation.

The fact that major media outlets cannot or will not make this basic distinction reveals everything about how immigration debates have been corrupted by ideology. Pérez-Bravo made choices. He chose to enter the country illegally. He chose to steal someone’s identity. He chose to drive under the influence. He chose to continue operating under a false identity even as the consequences for his victim mounted.

Kluver made no such choices. He simply tried to live his life as a law-abiding American citizen, only to discover that his government cared more about processing paperwork than protecting him from a criminal who should never have been in the country in the first place.

The sympathetic framing of Pérez-Bravo as a hardworking father trying to make things right ignores the fundamental reality that every moment he spent living under Kluver’s identity was an ongoing crime with an ongoing victim.

Related: Trump Gets His Way as Indiana Republicans Reverse Course on Mid-Decade Redistricting