The political left’s selective memory problem has reached new heights of absurdity. As Democrats work themselves into a frenzy over the Trump administration’s strikes on suspected drug trafficking vessels in the Caribbean, a 1989 speech from then-Senator Joe Biden has resurfaced, revealing a level of hypocrisy that would be stunning if it were not so predictable.
“Let’s go after the drug lords where they live with an international strike force. There must be no safe haven for these narco-terrorists and they must know it,” Biden declared in his official Democratic Party response to President George H.W. Bush’s address on combating the cocaine epidemic. This was not some throwaway line. Biden was demanding aggressive military action against drug traffickers operating on foreign soil.
The facts are straightforward. In September 1989, President Bush announced a comprehensive plan to combat the crack cocaine crisis devastating American cities. The proposal included doubling federal assistance to state and local law enforcement, providing $65 million in emergency aid to nations like Colombia fighting cocaine cartels, and an overall $1.5 billion increase in drug-related federal spending.
Biden’s response? He called Bush’s plan insufficient. The Delaware senator demanded “another D-Day” to end the war on drugs, criticizing what he characterized as “another Vietnam, not another limited war fought on the cheap and destined for stalemate and human tragedy.”
Let that sink in. Biden explicitly called for a D-Day-level military operation against drug traffickers. He identified drugs as “the number one threat to our national security,” citing impacts on military readiness, worker productivity, student achievement, and family safety. “America is under attack, literally under attack by an enemy who is well financed, well supplied and well armed,” Biden warned.
This was not rhetorical flourish. Biden was advocating for precisely the kind of aggressive action against drug traffickers that Democrats now condemn when implemented by the Trump administration.
The context matters. During the 1980s and early 1990s, cocaine from Colombia flooded American streets, fueling a crack epidemic that destroyed communities. Crystal meth and heroin followed. The crisis demanded action, and Biden recognized this reality, calling drugs a literal attack on America requiring military response.
Fast forward to today. The Trump administration faces a fentanyl crisis that makes the crack epidemic look minor by comparison. Fentanyl, primarily manufactured in Mexico using precursor chemicals from China, killed over 70,000 Americans last year alone. The Trump administration has responded with targeted strikes on drug trafficking operations in the Caribbean, and Democrats have erupted in manufactured outrage.
The inconsistency is not merely political opportunism. It represents a fundamental abdication of the responsibility Biden himself once recognized. When Biden demanded an international strike force against narco-terrorists, he understood that drug trafficking organizations pose genuine national security threats requiring serious responses.
Either Biden was correct in 1989 that aggressive military action against drug traffickers serves American interests, or he was wrong. If he was correct then, Democrats criticizing Trump’s similar approach today are hypocrites. If he was wrong then, his judgment on national security matters has always been questionable.
The American people deserve consistency from their leaders. They deserve officials who recognize that protecting citizens from drug trafficking organizations requires more than speeches and symbolic gestures. Biden once understood this. His party’s current position suggests they have forgotten, or more likely, never cared about consistency when political advantage is at stake.
Related: High Court Sides With Texas on Redistricting Despite Democratic Claims of Racial Gerrymandering
