Let’s talk about selective memory, because what we’re witnessing from Democrats right now is a masterclass in political amnesia. Rep. Sarah McBride just suggested that Trump “only fires women,” pointing to recent departures like Kristi Noem and Pam Bondi as evidence of some sinister pattern. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez jumped on the bandwagon too, asking if Trump had “run out of women” to fire. Jennifer Siebel Newsom, California’s First Partner, declared that “no woman is safe in Trump’s Republican Party.”
Here’s what they’re conveniently forgetting. These same Democrats were practically throwing parties when these women left their positions. Rep. Eric Swalwell said everyone in America was safer because Noem got fired. Rep. Jamie Raskin admitted there was “exhilaration” over her departure. Rep. Pramila Jayapal claimed Noem’s “corruption” and “lawlessness” would bring her down. So which is it? Were they victims of sexism or incompetent officials who deserved removal?
The hypocrisy gets thicker. Pam Bondi faced such intense backlash and threats from the left that she reportedly had to relocate to a military base near Washington. Democrats were lining up to take shots at her. Rep. Dan Goldman said support for holding her in contempt was “growing.” Rep. Robert Garcia insisted removal “has to be on the table.” Rep. Summer Lee went so far as to introduce actual articles of impeachment against her. They wanted her gone. They demanded it. And now they’re upset she’s gone?
You know what’s really happening here? Democrats are trying to manufacture a narrative that doesn’t exist because the facts don’t support their claims. Men have left the administration too. Joe Kent, former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, departed. So did John Phelan, Secretary of the Navy. But those exits don’t fit the story they’re trying to tell, so they get conveniently ignored.
This is about politics, not patterns. When Trump moves women into different roles within his administration, like Noem becoming special envoy for The Shield of the Americas, that’s somehow proof of sexism. When he praises their work, saying Noem “served us well” or that Bondi “did a tremendous job overseeing a massive crackdown in Crime,” those words mean nothing to critics already convinced of his guilt.
The left has painted itself into a corner here. They spent weeks calling for these women to be fired, impeached, or removed. They questioned their competence, their integrity, their fitness for office. And now that personnel changes have actually happened, they’re claiming it’s evidence of a war on women. It’s exhausting to watch.
What really bothers me about this whole charade is how it cheapens legitimate concerns about workplace discrimination. When you cry wolf over personnel decisions that you yourself advocated for, you make it harder for people to recognize actual sexism when it occurs. That matters. Real women facing real discrimination deserve better than this cynical political theater.
The American people aren’t stupid. They can see through this manufactured outrage. They remember who was demanding these officials be removed just weeks ago. They notice when the same politicians who celebrated these departures suddenly discover they’re victims of gender bias. The whiplash would be funny if it weren’t so transparently dishonest.
At the end of the day, this is what happens when your opposition to someone becomes so reflexive that you lose track of your own positions. Democrats wanted these women gone. They got what they wanted. And now they’re mad about it anyway.
Related: Speaker Johnson’s Spy Bill Is All Oversight and Zero Warrant Requirement