New Jersey Tells American Students to Get in Line Behind Illegal Immigrants

The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against New Jersey this week that cuts right to the bone of a question we’ve been dancing around for years. Why are American citizens getting shoved aside in their own country?

The lawsuit targets state laws that hand out in-state tuition rates and financial aid to illegal immigrants while actual U.S. citizens from other states pay full freight. Think about that for a second. A kid from Pennsylvania pays out-of-state tuition at Rutgers while someone who entered the country illegally gets the resident discount. That’s not compassion. That’s discrimination with a progressive bow tied around it.

Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate didn’t mince words. “This Department of Justice will not tolerate American students being treated like second-class citizens in their own country,” he said. Honestly, it’s refreshing to hear someone in Washington speak that plainly. We’ve spent so long pretending that pointing out these absurdities makes you heartless that we forgot basic fairness used to be a bipartisan value.

New Jersey’s current policy lets students who meet residency requirements qualify for in-state tuition regardless of legal status. They can access scholarships and financial aid too. Supporters claim it’s about residency, not immigration status. But that argument collapses under the weight of its own logic. You know what else requires legal residency? Voting. Working. Existing in this country without breaking federal law.

Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward framed it perfectly when he asked people to imagine being denied educational opportunities in your own country. That’s exactly what happens when states create a two-tiered system where following the rules puts you at a disadvantage. We’ve normalized rewarding people who cut in line while telling everyone else to wait their turn and pay full price.

This isn’t the Trump administration’s first rodeo on this issue. It’s the ninth lawsuit challenging state policies that extend benefits to illegal immigrants. Similar cases in Texas, Kentucky, and Oklahoma have already resulted in courts blocking these kinds of laws. Nebraska recently ended its in-state tuition benefits for illegal immigrants through a DOJ settlement. The pattern is clear, and the legal reasoning is sound.

The free market works when everyone plays by the same rules. Limited government means states shouldn’t be in the business of creating incentive structures that reward illegal behavior. Individual liberty includes the freedom to pursue education without your own government putting its thumb on the scale against you because you were born here.

Some will call this cruel or xenophobic. They’re wrong. Cruelty is telling a working-class American family that their kid doesn’t deserve the same tuition break as someone who violated immigration law. There’s nothing compassionate about a system that punishes citizenship and rewards illegal entry. We can debate immigration policy all day long, but handing out benefits that aren’t available to all citizens isn’t policy. It’s preferential treatment dressed up as virtue.

Traditional principles used to include the idea that laws matter and citizenship means something. When did we decide those concepts were outdated? State governments have gotten comfortable ignoring federal immigration law when it suits their political brand. But the Constitution doesn’t have an asterisk that says states can pick and choose which federal statutes apply within their borders.

The students who’ve lived in New Jersey for years under these policies didn’t create this mess. Neither did the American kids paying higher tuition. State lawmakers did. They made a choice to prioritize political posturing over legal residents and citizens. Now the bill is coming due, and it’s about time someone presented it.

Related: JD Vance Calls Out Walz’s Shameless Attempt to Claim Victory Over Daycare Fraud