There’s a moment in every political cycle when someone says something so brazen, so detached from basic human instinct, that you have to stop and wonder if we’re all living in the same reality. Melat Kiros just gave us one of those moments.

The Gen Z socialist running to unseat Democrat Rep. Diana DeGette in Colorado’s 1st Congressional District recently appeared on the Call Me Limbo podcast to announce she’s updating her campaign website. What’s the big addition? A Trans Bill of Rights. But here’s where it gets dark. Kiros thinks it’s “horrific” and “absolutely destructive” to protect children from genital mutilation surgery.

Let that sink in for a second. A woman running for Congress believes the real horror isn’t cutting up healthy kids. The real horror, in her view, is trying to stop it.

She’s talking about Initiative No. 110, a Colorado ballot measure that would prohibit healthcare professionals from performing surgeries on minors to alter their biological sex characteristics. It’s straightforward stuff. The initiative says doctors can’t perform these procedures on kids, and it blocks federal and state funds from paying for them. Most parents would call this common sense. Kiros calls it horrific.

“I think we have to be so forceful and clear and aggressive in our protection and our advocacy for the trans community, especially for trans kids,” she said on the podcast. Notice the language there. Forceful. Aggressive. These aren’t words you use when you’re defending something obviously good and true. These are the words of someone who knows they’re pushing against human nature itself and needs to bulldoze through the resistance.

Here’s what really gets me. Kiros went further, saying Democrats who won’t go along with this agenda aren’t real Democrats. “You’re not a Democrat,” she emphasized, as if party membership now requires you to endorse irreversible medical procedures on children. The purity test has arrived, and it’s written in surgical scars.

This isn’t about adults making choices for themselves. Nobody’s talking about that. We’re talking about kids who can’t vote, can’t buy cigarettes, can’t get a tattoo in most states, but according to Kiros should absolutely be able to have their healthy bodies surgically altered based on feelings they might not even have in five years. The cognitive dissonance is staggering.

Her campaign website lays it all out. She supports “access to gender-affirming care for all ages.” All ages. That means no age is too young in her mind. She also wants to abolish ICE, implement Medicare for All, guarantee abortion access, and provide universal childcare. It’s the full socialist wish list, but the Trans Bill of Rights sits right there among her top priorities.

And speaking of abortion, Kiros posted a video on social media using a voiceover that says, “I love abortion.” She’s making light of ending human life. This isn’t nuance or compassion. This is ideological possession.

What strikes me most is how Kiros frames this as a defensive battle that Democrats are losing. “I think we’ve been on the defensive,” she said, “and I think there are Democrats that have even considered abandoning our solidarity.” The reality is quite different. The American people are waking up to what’s being done to children in the name of affirmation and inclusion. Parents are realizing that compassion doesn’t mean agreeing to everything a confused child asks for, especially when what they’re asking for involves scalpels and hormones.

There’s something deeply unsettling about a political movement that considers protecting children from permanent bodily harm to be an act of bigotry. We’ve reached a point where basic parental instinct, the kind that’s kept the human race alive for millennia, is now considered hateful.

A Data for Progress poll shows Kiros leading DeGette 41 percent to 36 percent in the primary race. That’s worth noting. This isn’t some fringe candidate shouting into the void. She’s got support, at least in a heavily Democratic district in Denver. But winning a primary in a safe blue district doesn’t mean your ideas reflect mainstream American values. It just means you’ve captured a particular slice of the most activated base voters.

The question isn’t whether Kiros will win. The question is whether the Democratic Party will continue down this path, alienating parents and anyone with basic protective instincts toward children. Because if protecting kids from irreversible surgery is now considered horrific, then the party has lost its moral compass entirely. They’ve traded common sense for ideology, and they’re asking the rest of us to applaud while they do it.

We used to understand that children needed protection, that their brains weren’t fully developed, that they couldn’t consent to permanent, life-altering decisions. That wasn’t controversial. That was civilization. Now apparently it’s horrific. The word has lost all meaning in Kiros’s hands, and that should worry everyone, regardless of party.

Related: Kennedy Center Left in Limbo After Court Blocks Hasty Renovation Scheme