Twenty Million Dollars Bought Biden a Blueprint for Transgender Indoctrination

The Biden administration didn’t just stumble into radical transgender policy. They went shopping for it, checkbook in hand, ready to fund the most extreme voices they could find. And boy, did they find them.

When you need someone to push gender ideology into every corner of child welfare, apparently there’s a go-to place. The University of Connecticut’s National Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Expression Center, mercifully shortened to SOGIE Center, became a subcontractor for a $20 million grant from Health and Human Services. Their mission? Help create Biden’s own SOGIE Institute. The name similarity wasn’t coincidental. These people were drafting the playbook for transforming how America handles vulnerable children.

Let’s be clear about what we’re talking about here. This wasn’t some academic exercise in tolerance or understanding. The UConn group spent years pushing gender ideology into child welfare systems nationwide, and the Biden team looked at that track record and thought, “Perfect. That’s exactly who should help us reshape federal policy.”

You know what’s particularly galling? These are the same folks who would have helped the Children’s Bureau implement Biden’s April directives. We’re talking about the government agency responsible for protecting America’s most vulnerable kids, and the administration wanted activists running the show. Not child psychologists focused on stability. Not social workers with decades of experience in family preservation. Activists with an agenda.

The timing matters too. This wasn’t a first-term experiment. By the time Biden officials were planning for a potential second term, they’d already laid groundwork to enshrine transgenderism in federal law. They knew exactly what they wanted, and they knew who could deliver it. The UConn SOGIE Center represented the vanguard of this movement, the true believers who’d spent years figuring out how to embed these ideas into institutions that touch millions of American families.

Think about the implications for a moment. Child welfare systems deal with kids in crisis, children removed from homes, families struggling with poverty or addiction or abuse. These situations demand wisdom, caution, and an unwavering focus on what’s genuinely best for each child. Instead, the Biden administration wanted to inject a specific ideological framework into every decision, every placement, every interaction.

The conservative position here isn’t complicated. Parents, not government bureaucrats and certainly not activists with a social agenda, should guide their children’s upbringing. Limited government means the state shouldn’t use its massive power to push experimental ideas about gender onto families, especially families already in vulnerable positions dealing with child welfare systems.

We talk about individual liberty, and there’s no liberty more fundamental than a parent’s right to raise their children according to their values and beliefs. When federal agencies partner with ideological groups to bypass parental authority, that’s not progress. That’s government overreach dressed up in the language of inclusion.

The $20 million figure deserves emphasis too. That’s taxpayer money, your money, funding an effort to reshape American child welfare according to one narrow ideological vision. Free-market principles tell us competition and choice produce better outcomes. Instead, HHS picked winners and losers, channeling massive resources toward groups that shared their predetermined conclusions about gender.

Here’s the thing that should worry every American regardless of political affiliation. Once you allow government bureaucracies to partner with activist organizations to implement social policy that contradicts traditional values and parental rights, where does it stop? Today it’s gender ideology in child welfare. Tomorrow it’s something else, some other fundamental aspect of family life that activists and compliant bureaucrats decide needs transformation.

The Biden administration came dangerously close to permanently embedding this approach into federal law and practice. That they didn’t succeed doesn’t mean the threat disappeared. These networks of activists and sympathetic bureaucrats remain in place, waiting for the next opportunity to advance their agenda. Understanding what almost happened isn’t paranoia. It’s necessary vigilance.

Related: Belfast Burns After Sudanese Migrant Attempts to Behead Man in Broad Daylight