There’s something revealing about watching Democrats tie themselves in knots trying to appear culturally sensitive while simultaneously launching what can only be described as a racist attack. Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed just gave us a masterclass in this particular brand of hypocrisy, and second lady Usha Vance’s response was perfect in its simplicity. She laughed.

The whole mess started when Vice President JD Vance called out El-Sayed for previously arguing that criticisms of Sharia law were rooted in white supremacy. It’s the kind of statement that makes you wonder if some people have completely lost the plot. Vance invoked his late grandfather, saying he’d love to go back in time and tell his Papaw about a Democrat who thinks criticizing Sharia law makes you a white supremacist. Fair point, honestly.

El-Sayed’s response? He took a cheap shot at Usha Vance’s Indian heritage, writing on social media: “So do we think JD is taking Usha with him back in time to meet Papaw, or no…” The implication was crystal clear. He was suggesting that Vance’s grandfather, a man who died in 1997, would have rejected his own grandson’s wife because of her ethnicity.

Let that sink in for a moment. A Democratic candidate, from the party that never stops lecturing Americans about racism and inclusion, just publicly insinuated that an interracial marriage wouldn’t have been accepted by working-class people in Appalachia. The irony is so thick you could cut it with a knife.

Usha Vance’s response in her exclusive Fox and Friends interview was everything it needed to be. “I have to admit, I kind of laughed,” she said. “Because yes, I never met JD’s Mamaw and Papaw. But I do know and love the children that they raised, his mom, his aunt and uncle. And they have never been anything but incredibly loving.”

You know what’s beautiful about that answer? It doesn’t engage with El-Sayed’s racist premise. She simply stated facts. The family that James and Bonnie Vance raised welcomed her with open arms. The second lady mentioned that JD’s aunt has become like a second mother to her. These are real relationships with real people, not the caricatures that coastal elites like to paint of Appalachian families.

El-Sayed tried to walk it back by claiming he was making some point about Vance thinking “some people are more American than others.” He told MS NOW that he was questioning how Vance could look his parents-in-law in the eye while implying they’re somehow less American. But that’s pure deflection. Nobody was talking about Usha’s parents being less American. The vice president was talking about cultural values and whether criticizing certain practices makes someone a white supremacist.

This whole episode reveals something deeper about modern progressive politics. There’s this assumption baked into Democratic thinking that traditional, working-class Americans are inherently bigoted. They can’t help themselves. It’s patronizing and, frankly, it’s exactly the kind of coastal condescension that pushed millions of voters away from the Democratic Party in the first place.

JD Vance was raised primarily by his grandparents after his mother struggled with addiction. His story, detailed in his memoir, is one of redemption and family bonds that transcended difficult circumstances. He met Usha at Yale Law School, and they married in 2014. They now have four children together. It’s an American success story that apparently makes some people uncomfortable because it doesn’t fit their narrative.

The real question isn’t whether Papaw would have accepted Usha. The real question is why Democrats keep assuming the worst about the very voters they claim to represent. That assumption, more than anything else, explains why Michigan might be tougher for them than they think this cycle.

Related: The One Trump Policy Even California’s Governor Can’t Bring Himself to Attack