Washington Democrats Burn Through $20 Million to Cover Just 173 Migrants

Washington state Democrats just pulled off something remarkable, and not in a good way. They managed to spend $20 million on a healthcare program that was supposed to cover 300 migrants but only reached 173. Let that sink in for a moment. That’s roughly $115,000 per person for a program that was already controversial before anyone knew how spectacularly it would underperform.

The Service Employees International Union 775, one of the groups that pushed hardest for this program, is now calling the results “disappointing and frustrating.” You know what’s actually frustrating? Watching elected officials rush through spending bills without doing basic math first. The program was eventually meant to help 1,200 noncitizen residents in the Evergreen State, but lawmakers are now admitting they’ll need tens of millions more to actually hit that target.

This is government inefficiency at its finest. When private businesses miscalculate this badly, they go bankrupt. When government does it, they just ask for more money.

Here’s the thing about fiscal responsibility that seems lost on progressive legislators. It’s not just about whether a cause sounds compassionate. It’s about whether the execution makes any sense whatsoever. You can have the best intentions in the world, but if you’re burning through taxpayer dollars at a rate of over $100,000 per beneficiary, something has gone catastrophically wrong with your planning.

The broader pattern here matters too. This isn’t an isolated incident of government waste. It’s part of a larger philosophy that treats public funds like Monopoly money, where the goal is to spend as much as possible on programs that sound good in press releases. The people pushing these initiatives rarely face consequences when the numbers don’t add up. They just pivot to demanding more funding while taxpayers foot the bill for their miscalculations.

Think about what else $20 million could have done. That’s enough to fund significant improvements to infrastructure, support small business development, or provide real assistance to struggling American citizens who’ve been paying into the system their entire lives. Instead, it covered healthcare for 173 noncitizens at a cost that would make even the most bloated federal program blush.

The SEIU’s disappointment is telling. Even the groups advocating for expanded migrant benefits recognize this program failed to deliver on its promises. When your allies are publicly expressing frustration, you’ve got a serious problem. But don’t expect any real accountability here. The same legislators who approved this mess will likely vote to throw more money at it rather than admit the entire approach was flawed from the start.

This is what happens when compassion becomes divorced from competence. Good intentions don’t excuse terrible execution, and taxpayers shouldn’t have to keep paying for programs that can’t manage basic cost projections. Washington state Democrats rushed this through their controlled legislature without apparently asking anyone to run the numbers properly. Now they’re stuck with a program that costs exponentially more per person than anyone anticipated, and their solution is predictable. They want more money.

At some point, voters need to demand better. Not just better programs, but better stewardship of public resources. The people’s money deserves more respect than this.

Related: After Supreme Court Ruling, ICE Begins Monitoring Haitians as Deportations Loom