Here’s something that should infuriate every taxpayer who’s been paying attention. The Trump administration is back at the Supreme Court for the third time, asking the justices to let them do what should be the most basic function of any sovereign nation: remove dangerous criminals who entered illegally and have no right to be here. It’s 2025, and we’re still fighting about whether America can deport people who broke our laws.
Solicitor General John Sauer filed an emergency application Thursday after a Biden-appointed judge named Brian Murphy torpedoed the administration’s Safe Third Country policy. That’s the framework allowing deportations to nations willing to accept migrants when their home countries simply refuse to take them back. Let that sink in for a moment. We’ve got foreign governments literally saying “no thanks” when we try returning their own citizens, and then we’ve got our own federal judges saying we can’t send them anywhere else either.
The policy has been running for 15 months. It’s moved thousands of people out of the country already, with thousands more waiting. Sauer described them accurately as some of the worst of the worst criminal aliens. These aren’t sympathetic cases we’re talking about. DHS had to cancel a flight carrying 70 deportees, some with serious criminal records, to three different countries. The plane was ready. The agreements were signed. Then the First Circuit dissolved its own pause on Murphy’s ruling late Wednesday, and suddenly the whole operation ground to a halt.
You know what’s really happening here? We’ve created a system where being unwanted becomes a shield. If your home country won’t take you back and courts won’t let us send you somewhere else, congratulations. You’ve found a loophole that lets you stay in America indefinitely, regardless of what crimes you’ve committed or how you got here. It’s absurd on its face.
Human rights groups are predictably wringing their hands, claiming the administration wants to send people to countries where they face life-threatening conditions. Trina Realmuto from the National Immigration Litigation Alliance made that argument, as if the alternative of keeping violent criminals in American communities is somehow the more humane choice. They count more than 25,000 migrants deported to 29 countries since this policy started, most of them to Mexico. They say that number like it’s a scandal. I say it sounds like government actually functioning.
Marco Rubio’s State Department has negotiated Safe Third Country agreements with up to 31 nations, mostly across Africa and Latin America. The price tag runs at least $410 million authorized or pledged through June. That’s real money, sure. But consider the alternative costs. Housing these individuals in federal custody isn’t free. The crimes some commit while we wait for their home countries to maybe eventually accept them aren’t free either, especially not for the victims.
The Supreme Court has already sided with the administration twice in this exact case. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who handles emergency applications from the First Circuit, gave the migrants’ lawyers until Monday afternoon to respond. The smart money says the Court grants the stay, because the alternative is admitting that America has lost the most fundamental attribute of sovereignty: control over who stays and who goes.
This isn’t complicated legal theory. When someone enters illegally, commits crimes, gets caught, and faces deportation, the process should be straightforward. Their home country should take them back. When that country refuses, we need backup options. Safe Third Countries provide those options. Blocking this policy doesn’t protect anyone except people who’ve already demonstrated they don’t respect our laws.
The judges throwing sand in these gears aren’t protecting constitutional rights or upholding justice. They’re substituting their policy preferences for the elected government’s authority to enforce immigration law. That’s the heart of it. Murphy’s ruling essentially says America must keep people we’ve determined should leave, even when we’ve found willing nations to accept them and even when keeping them here poses risks nobody wants to honestly calculate.
Every nation that refuses to accept its own citizens back is making a calculated decision. They’re exporting their problems to us, and they’ll keep doing it as long as we let them. The Safe Third Country framework at least creates consequences and alternatives. Without it, we’re stuck in an endless holding pattern where deportation orders become suggestions and criminal aliens become permanent residents by default.
The administration will probably win this round. The Court’s previous decisions suggest they understand what’s at stake. But the fact we’re fighting this battle three times at the Supreme Court level tells you everything about how immigration enforcement has been weaponized through litigation. Delay becomes victory. Process becomes punishment. And somewhere in America tonight, communities are less safe because judges decided bureaucratic procedure matters more than common sense.
Related: Democrats Ran a Billion Dollar Pyramid Scheme and Called It a Campaign