Sometimes the Constitution has a way of reminding politicians that their ideological ambitions don’t trump federal law. That lesson arrived Monday for Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger when Judge Robert Payne blocked a cornerstone of her administration’s attempt to hamstring federal immigration enforcement.
The ruling came just one day before local sheriffs across Virginia would have been forced to abandon their 287(g) agreements with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. These agreements, for those unfamiliar with the alphabet soup of federal programs, allow trained local law enforcement officers to perform certain immigration enforcement functions. They’re practical arrangements that make communities safer by identifying dangerous individuals who happen to be in the country illegally.
Judge Payne, appointed by President George H.W. Bush, didn’t mince words. He found that Virginia’s law likely violates the Contracts Clause of the U.S. Constitution because it substantially impairs existing agreements between the federal government and local jurisdictions. More fundamentally, he concluded that Virginia was trying to regulate the conduct of federal law enforcement officers enforcing federal immigration laws. That’s not how our system works, despite what some blue state governors seem to believe.
Virginia House Minority Leader Terry Kilgore’s response captured the frustration many Republicans feel watching this legal theater unfold. “At this point, saying ‘I told you so’ seems almost pointless,” he told reporters. His caucus warned repeatedly that Spanberger’s restrictions would waste taxpayer money and face immediate legal challenges. States cannot tell the federal government how to do its job. But Democrats refused to listen, driven by a base that treats any cooperation with ICE as moral apostasy.
The timing here matters. This wasn’t some rushed executive order issued in response to a crisis. Spanberger signed this legislation deliberately, knowing full well that all five of Virginia’s Republican members of Congress had written her urging restraint. They asked her not to undo former Governor Glenn Youngkin’s statewide directive promoting cooperation between Richmond and Washington on immigration enforcement. She ignored them, and now Virginia taxpayers get to fund the legal defense of an unconstitutional law.
Representative Ben Cline saw this coming and crafted federal legislation to counter exactly this kind of state interference. His 287(g) Cooperation Act would require state and local law enforcement to enter into agreements with ICE as a condition of receiving federal Community-Oriented Policing grants. It’s a reasonable response to unreasonable obstruction. If states want federal money, they should cooperate with federal law enforcement priorities.
The Virginia case doesn’t exist in isolation. Neighboring Maryland is fighting the same battle after Governor Wes Moore allowed similar legislation to become law. Here’s where the disconnect between Democratic governance and actual communities becomes glaring. Maryland is one of the bluest states in the nation, yet most of its counties are geographically red. That reality manifested when 17 of the state’s 24 sheriffs, led by Jeffrey Gahler of Harford County, Mike Lewis of Wicomico County, and Charles Jenkins of Frederick County, filed their own lawsuit challenging the restrictions.
Think about that for a moment. Nearly three-quarters of Maryland’s elected sheriffs are suing their own state government over immigration policy. These aren’t political appointees or bureaucrats. They’re law enforcement officers elected by their communities who understand the practical dangers of preventing cooperation with federal authorities. They know which crimes get committed by individuals who shouldn’t be in the country. They’ve seen the consequences when ideology overrides common sense.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul is taking a similar path, proudly touting her state’s ban on 287(g) agreements while 15 county sheriffs prepare legal challenges. When sheriffs sue over these laws, it tells you something important. The people closest to the problem, the ones actually responsible for public safety, recognize these restrictions as dangerous political posturing.
The Department of Homeland Security has already warned that these state-level obstructions will force more visible federal immigration operations. When local sheriffs can’t quietly transfer custody of dangerous individuals to ICE, federal agents have to conduct public operations that look more dramatic and disruptive. Blue state governors are creating the very spectacle they claim to oppose.
Judge Payne’s decision matters beyond Virginia. It establishes legal precedent that other courts will consider as similar cases move forward in Maryland, New York, and wherever else progressive governors decide constitutional limits don’t apply to them. The federal government appears likely to prevail, and these laws will eventually fall.
What remains is the question nobody in Spanberger’s administration seems willing to answer. Was this worth it? Worth the taxpayer money, the legal uncertainty, the weakened public safety? Or was it just another round of political theater designed to satisfy a base that demands resistance regardless of consequence?
Related: Deleted Email Exposes Letitia James Telling Staff to Target Trump Without Probable Cause