A Federal Judge Just Caught the Trump Administration Playing Games With 430 Trees

Judge Ana Reyes wasn’t just angry. She was the kind of furious that makes you question whether anyone in the room understands what good faith actually means anymore. On Monday, she extended her order blocking any further tree removal at East Potomac Golf Course in Washington until late October, and honestly, who could blame her?

Here’s what happened. The Trump administration wants to transform this public course into something that can host professional tournaments. That’s the goal. But there’s a lawsuit from the D.C. Preservation League standing in the way, and Reyes had made it crystal clear during a May hearing that she didn’t want even ten trees cut down without proper notice to the plaintiffs. Ten trees. She was specific about that number.

So what did the government do? They sent notice at 4:55 p.m. on a Friday before a holiday weekend that tree cutting would begin. The National Park Service started sawing on Saturday. By the time the D.C. Preservation League could file for a temporary restraining order on Sunday, 430 trees were already gone.

Four hundred and thirty trees.

You can feel the judge’s exasperation radiating through the court transcript. “I am just at a total loss to understand what has happened here,” Reyes said during Monday’s hourslong hearing. She wasn’t buying the government’s explanation that they’d done their best with the notice. “You did not do your best! You did your absolute worst!” she interrupted when Justice Department attorney Marissa Ann Piropato tried that line.

The thing is, this wasn’t some emergency situation. The government claimed the tree removal was part of a 2019 plan to clear dead, dying, and hazardous trees. A plan from 2019. So why the sudden urgency over a holiday weekend? Why the Friday afternoon notice that gave plaintiffs essentially no time to respond? Reyes wants answers, and she’s going to get them directly from Interior Department official Gregory Wischer and acting National Park Service director Jessica Bowron at next Monday’s hearing.

This case matters beyond just trees and golf courses. It’s about whether government attorneys can game the system by technically complying with court orders while completely undermining their spirit. It’s about whether political appointees can just bulldoze through litigation by creating facts on the ground before judges can intervene. You know what’s really at stake here? The basic principle that courts can actually restrain executive action when necessary.

The government had previously pledged to provide notice about any irrevocable harm at the golf course. Cutting down hundreds of trees certainly qualifies as irrevocable. Trees don’t grow back overnight. Some of those trees were probably decades old, maybe older. Once they’re gone, they’re gone for good.

Reyes made clear she’s considering a more extensive preliminary injunction that would block further renovations while the litigation plays out. She’s ordered written briefs from both sides on that question. The hearing stretched for hours on Monday as she pressed for answers about who ordered the tree removal and when they knew about it. The judge suspects the administration deliberately delayed informing plaintiffs and the court so they could clear as many trees as possible before anyone could stop them.

That’s not how our system is supposed to work. Courts issue orders, and government attorneys are supposed to follow them in good faith, not look for workarounds and loopholes. Limited government means government bound by law, including court orders. When federal attorneys play these games, they undermine the very rule of law that conservatives champion.

The Trump administration’s broader vision for beautifying Washington includes multiple projects across the capital. Some of them make sense. Some of them don’t. But whether you support the golf course renovation or not, the process matters. Following court orders matters. Giving plaintiffs real notice instead of Friday afternoon drive-bys matters.

Judge Reyes gave the government every benefit of the doubt for months. She said so herself. And this is how they repaid that courtesy. Now she’s furious, disappointed, and clearly done playing nice. The October 26 deadline gives everyone time to figure out what actually happened here and whether the government’s attorneys misrepresented facts to the court.

Four hundred and thirty trees. That number’s going to echo through next week’s hearing.

Related: New York Socialist Says Criminal Past of Man Shot by ICE Doesn’t Matter at All