There’s something profoundly disturbing about a United States Senate candidate who can’t distinguish between civil rights heroes and convicted cop killers. Yet here we are, watching Angie Nixon, a Democratic Socialists of America member running against Senator Ashley Moody for Florida’s Senate seat, defend her decision to plaster portraits of Marxist murderers across the walls of her Jacksonville bookstore.
Nixon calls her establishment “Cafe Resistance,” which should tell you everything you need to know. She opened it, she says, because freedoms were under attack and people needed somewhere to “be safely.” The irony is thick enough to choke on. She’s creating a safe space by celebrating someone who made the world decidedly unsafe for law enforcement officers trying to protect their communities.
Let’s be crystal clear about who Assata Shakur really is. Born Joanne Deborah Chesimard, she’s a convicted cop killer who murdered New Jersey State Trooper Werner Foerster in cold blood. She’s not some misunderstood freedom fighter. She’s a fugitive who fled to Cuba and lived under the protection of a communist dictatorship. The FBI listed her as one of America’s most wanted terrorists. These aren’t debatable facts subject to interpretation or historical revision.
Nixon’s defense is even more troubling than the original offense. When confronted about her wall decorations, which also include Angela Davis and other radical figures, she waved it away as teaching history. “History is good, it’s bad, it’s messy, it’s ugly, but it needs to be learned,” she said. Then came the real kicker. She suggested that many of these convicted criminals were “set up” before quickly adding, “Not all, right? Maybe. I don’t know. Possibly.”
You don’t know? You’re running for the United States Senate and you don’t know whether the cop killers you’re celebrating on your walls are actually guilty? That’s not intellectual humility. That’s moral cowardice wrapped in progressive rhetoric.
The left has spent years lecturing Americans about the importance of believing facts, trusting institutions, and respecting the rule of law. But when it comes to convicted murderers who fit their ideological narrative, suddenly every jury verdict becomes suspect. Every conviction might be a frame job. Every terrorist could be a freedom fighter if you squint hard enough and ignore the bodies.
Nixon claims Senator Moody sent a “heckler” to disrupt her press conference and trash talk her wall art. She’s positioning herself as the victim here, which takes spectacular audacity. A law enforcement officer lost his life. A family was shattered. And she’s complaining about getting criticized for honoring his killer.
She also admitted her bookstore is hemorrhaging money. She’s personally funding it to keep the doors open, which raises questions any fiscally responsible voter should ask. If she can’t run a small bookstore without bleeding cash, what makes her qualified to help manage a federal budget measured in trillions? The free market is sending her a clear signal. She’s ignoring it, naturally, because that’s what socialists do.
This isn’t about whitewashing history or sanitizing uncomfortable truths. Americans can handle complex historical figures. We can grapple with leaders who achieved great things while harboring serious flaws. But there’s a universe of difference between teaching about controversial figures and celebrating them. Context matters. Intent matters. Shakur didn’t advance civil rights. She murdered a man doing his job.
The conservative vision of America includes vigorous debate about our past. We should teach the good and the bad, the triumphs and the failures. But we should never confuse terrorism with activism or murder with resistance. Some lines are bright and clear, not blurry shades of gray.
Nixon’s campaign reveals the dangerous trajectory of the modern left. They’ve moved so far from mainstream American values that they can’t even recognize how offensive this is to ordinary citizens. They’re so captured by radical ideology that honoring cop killers seems defensible if dressed up as historical education.
Florida voters deserve better than someone who quotes convicted terrorists on the campaign trail and then acts surprised when people object. They deserve a senator who understands that law enforcement officers are heroes, not oppressors. They deserve leadership that doesn’t require a flowchart to figure out whether celebrating murderers is appropriate.
This race isn’t complicated. It’s a choice between respecting the rule of law and romanticizing those who violently opposed it. Senator Moody represents order, justice, and traditional American values. Nixon represents chaos masked as resistance. The choice should be obvious.
Related: Trump Finally Gets His Hearing on Lisa Cook After Supreme Court Forces His Hand
