There’s a certain poetic justice unfolding here that’s impossible to ignore. Letitia James, the New York Attorney General who’s built much of her career on pursuing Donald Trump with prosecutorial zeal, now finds herself on the receiving end of criminal referrals sent to the Department of Justice. The Trump administration isn’t playing defense anymore. They’re playing offense, and they’re doing it by the book.

Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte submitted the referrals alleging potential insurance fraud connected to properties linked to James. The DOJ confirmed receipt, and now U.S. attorneys in Florida and reportedly Illinois are reviewing the allegations. This isn’t some political stunt cooked up in a back room. These are official criminal referrals following proper channels, the kind of institutional process Democrats claim to revere when it suits their narrative.

The specific allegation centers on suspected homeowners insurance fraud. Jason Quinones, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida, will determine whether there’s enough substance here to seek a grand jury indictment. That’s how the system works when you actually respect it instead of weaponizing it for political gain.

You know what’s fascinating? This comes after bank fraud charges against James were dismissed late last year by a Clinton-appointed judge. A grand jury in Virginia later refused to re-indict her. The judge threw out indictments against both James and former FBI Director James Comey after finding they were illegitimate because they’d been brought by an unqualified U.S. attorney. So we’re not exactly dealing with someone who’s unfamiliar with legal scrutiny.

The irony here cuts deep. James made her political bones going after Trump’s business practices, scrutinizing his property valuations and insurance claims with microscopic intensity. She turned the Trump Organization inside out looking for anything that might stick. Now she’s facing allegations in the same arena. If these referrals have merit, and that’s what the investigation will determine, then we’re witnessing accountability working both ways for once.

This matters because it speaks to a larger principle conservatives have been shouting about for years. The law should apply equally. Period. Not selectively based on party affiliation or political usefulness. When prosecutors become partisan warriors instead of impartial seekers of justice, the entire system corrodes from within. We’ve watched blue state attorneys general treat Republican figures like prey while their own allies skate by untouched. That double standard breeds contempt for institutions we’re supposed to trust.

Federal judges have already criticized the DOJ’s approach in related cases. One judge specifically called out an “indict first, investigate later” mentality that should alarm anyone who values due process. That’s not how justice works in a constitutional republic. That’s how political persecution works in banana republics.

The question now is whether these U.S. attorneys will pursue this with the same vigor James showed in her crusade against Trump. Will they follow the evidence wherever it leads, or will political considerations trump legal merit? We’ll find out soon enough. But the fact that these referrals exist at all, that they’ve been formally submitted and acknowledged, signals something important. The era of one-sided political prosecutions might finally be ending.

James can defend herself through the legal process, just like Trump had to do. That’s fair. That’s equal treatment under law. And honestly, that’s all conservatives have been asking for all along.

Related: Justice Alito Exposes the Absurd Word Games Threatening Border Sovereignty