The Justice Department just filed a lawsuit against Harvard University that should’ve happened years ago. The charge? Failing to address rampant antisemitism on campus. The penalty? Potentially billions of dollars in frozen grants and repayments to taxpayers who’ve been subsidizing an institution that can’t protect its Jewish students.

Let’s be clear about what’s happening here. This isn’t some petty political squabble. The DOJ’s lawsuit, filed Friday in Massachusetts federal court, accuses Harvard’s leadership of creating an environment so hostile to Jewish students that the government has grounds to claw back taxpayer money. We’re talking about $2.6 billion in research funding that’s already been slashed, plus who knows how much more they might have to return.

Harvard hasn’t commented yet, which honestly isn’t surprising. What do you say when you’ve been caught red-handed? The university has spent months in a standoff with the Trump administration, testing just how far they can push back against federal authority. They filed their own lawsuits claiming they’re being unfairly targeted for refusing to adopt the administration’s views. A federal judge even sided with them in December, calling the antisemitism concerns a “smokescreen” and reversing the funding cuts.

But here’s the thing that judge got wrong. This isn’t a smokescreen. Anyone paying attention to what’s been happening on elite campuses knows the antisemitism problem is real and it’s ugly. Jewish students have been harassed, intimidated, and made to feel unsafe in their own classrooms. Harvard’s administration watched it happen and did next to nothing.

The negotiations between Harvard and the Trump administration tell you everything you need to know about how seriously the university takes this. Last year, reports suggested they were close to a deal requiring Harvard to pay $500 million to regain federal funding and end the investigations. That’s half a billion dollars just to make the problem go away. But the deal never materialized because Harvard apparently thought it could wait out the administration or find a friendlier judge.

Trump upped the ante recently, raising the figure to $1 billion. His reasoning? Harvard has been “behaving very badly.” That’s putting it mildly. The university has an endowment north of $50 billion, yet it continues sucking up federal research grants while fostering an environment where Jewish students fear for their safety. The entitlement is staggering.

This lawsuit represents something bigger than just Harvard’s failures. Since taking office, Trump has gone after elite universities that he believes are overrun by left-wing ideology and antisemitism. He’s frozen billions in research grants across multiple institutions. Critics call it overreach. I call it accountability.

These universities have operated for decades with zero consequences, taking taxpayer dollars while turning their campuses into ideological echo chambers where certain viewpoints and certain students aren’t welcome. They’ve wrapped themselves in academic freedom while trampling on the civil rights of Jewish students who just want to attend class without being called genocidal colonizers.

The federal government has every right to attach strings to its money. If Harvard wants to run its campus like a radical political organizing hub where antisemitism flourishes, fine. Do it with your own $50 billion endowment. Stop asking taxpayers to foot the bill.

What’s particularly galling is Harvard’s response throughout this entire ordeal. Instead of acknowledging the problem and fixing it, they’ve lawyered up and played the victim. They claim they’re being persecuted for their independence. Please. This is the same institution that bent over backwards to accommodate every other identity group on campus but somehow couldn’t muster the will to protect Jewish students.

The battle between Trump and Harvard has tested the boundaries of government authority over universities, and that’s a conversation worth having. But let’s not lose sight of what sparked this confrontation. Jewish students reported feeling unsafe. The administration failed to act. Federal investigators found problems. Harvard stonewalled.

You know what happens in the real world when an organization takes government money and violates civil rights law? They lose that money and face consequences. Harvard shouldn’t be exempt just because it’s old and prestigious and has produced presidents and Supreme Court justices.

The lawsuit moves forward now through federal court in Massachusetts. Harvard will fight it with armies of lawyers. They’ll argue about precedent and authority and academic freedom. They’ll make it complicated because complicated helps them.

But the core issue remains simple. Did Harvard fail to address antisemitism on campus? If yes, should taxpayers continue funding them? The Trump administration has answered both questions definitively. Now it’s up to the courts to decide whether elite universities finally have to play by the same rules as everyone else.

Related: Big Tech’s Double Game Gets Exposed in Microsoft Executive’s Democratic Fundraiser