Railroad Union Leaders Sold Out Their Trump Voters for Progressive Pet Projects

Here’s what gets me about union leadership in America today. You’ve got 37,000 railroad workers busting their backs to keep freight moving across this country, and a solid chunk of them voted for Donald Trump. Twice. They believed in his vision for American workers, his promise to put their interests first, his commitment to the forgotten men and women who actually build things. And what did their union bosses do with their hard-earned dues? Funneled it straight to the same Democratic machine working overtime to dismantle everything those members voted for.

The American Accountability Foundation just dropped a report on the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division that should infuriate anyone who believes in representative democracy. We’re talking about $441,098 sent to left-wing organizations. The Center for American Progress got a nice chunk. Over $100,000 went to the National Democratic Club across multiple years. These aren’t neutral professional organizations. These are progressive attack dogs.

The union leadership attacked Trump during his first term, claiming he was dismantling Obama’s legacy like that was somehow a bad thing. They called his deregulation efforts dangerous. Dangerous. You know what’s actually dangerous? Strangling American industry with red tape until companies can’t compete globally and workers lose their jobs. But facts don’t matter when you’re more interested in political posturing than protecting your members’ livelihoods.

What really sticks in my craw is the sheer arrogance of it all. These union bosses watched their members vote for Trump in 2016. They saw them do it again in 2020. The realignment of working-class voters toward the Republican Party has been one of the most significant political shifts in a generation. Industrial union members have been sending a clear message about what they want and who they trust to deliver it. And the leadership’s response? Double down on supporting Black Lives Matter, abortion advocacy, and universal healthcare while opposing Trump’s legislative agenda.

The disconnect is stunning. That’s the word the AAF report uses, and it fits. We’re witnessing a stunning betrayal of democratic principles within organizations that are supposed to exist for democratic representation. Union leadership is supposed to reflect the will of the membership, not impose a progressive political agenda that most members actively reject at the ballot box.

Think about the average railroad maintenance worker for a second. He’s probably making decent money, supporting a family, concerned about border security and inflation and whether his kids are getting indoctrinated in schools. He joins a union because he wants workplace protection and fair wages. What he doesn’t want is his dues funding the National Teamsters Hispanic Caucus while it opposes immigration enforcement that he supports. He doesn’t want his money going to Democratic clubs and progressive think tanks dreaming up new ways to regulate his industry into oblivion.

The report also highlights connections between BMWED-IBT leadership and prominent Democrats like Representatives Jesús García and Dina Titus. Nothing wrong with maintaining relationships across party lines when it serves your members’ interests. But when those relationships become one-sided political partnerships that ignore what your members actually believe? That’s not representation. That’s exploitation.

This ties into a broader problem with institutional capture in America. Too many organizations claiming to serve ordinary people have been hijacked by leadership more concerned with their standing among coastal elites than with the folks they’re supposed to represent. Teachers unions are another perfect example. Recent reports show the two largest funneled nearly $50 million to left-wing groups. That’s money from teachers in red states and purple districts funding political causes they might vehemently oppose.

The timing of this report is particularly relevant given the current Republican push for union-friendly legislation. Vice President JD Vance and some House Republicans are trying to build bridges with organized labor, recognizing that working-class voters are increasingly Republican voters. But here’s the thing. You can’t build a functional relationship when union leadership is this disconnected from membership. Any legislation that empowers union bosses to keep operating like this just strengthens the very people betraying their members.

The rank-and-file workers deserve better. They deserve leadership that respects their political choices instead of undermining them. They deserve transparency about where their dues go and why. And they deserve the freedom to support the candidates and causes they believe in without their own union working against them.

This isn’t about destroying unions. Strong unions serving their members’ actual interests can be valuable. This is about accountability and democracy within institutions that have lost their way. When leadership forgets who they serve and why they exist, reform becomes necessary. The BMWED-IBT situation is a perfect case study in what happens when organizational elites prioritize ideology over the people paying their salaries.

Related: Did America’s Leading Trans Health Organization Mislead Parents About the Risks?