Senator Marsha Blackburn isn’t asking for permission anymore. The Tennessee Republican introduced legislation Tuesday that would explicitly reserve membership in the Daughters of the American Revolution for biological women, and honestly, the fact that we need federal legislation to state the obvious tells you everything about where we are as a country.

The Daughters of the American Revolution Membership Integrity Act would amend the organization’s federal charter to require members be actual women. Not people who identify as women. Not individuals on a gender journey. Women. The kind with two X chromosomes who can trace their lineage back to patriots who fought in the Revolutionary War.

“The Daughters of the American Revolution was founded by women for women, and its founders would be appalled that the organization is now allowing biological males to become members and undermine the legacy of real women who helped build our nation,” Blackburn told Fox News Digital. She’s not wrong. Picture those founding members from 1890, gathered in Washington to honor their female ancestors who sacrificed during America’s birth. Now picture explaining to them that in 2025, men can join their women’s organization because they feel like women.

You know what’s remarkable here? We’ve reached a point where protecting a heritage organization specifically designed to honor women requires an act of Congress. The DAR recently voted down a proposal to ban transgender members, which means the leadership decided that ideology matters more than biology. More than history. More than the very premise of their existence.

This isn’t about hate or discrimination or whatever buzzword gets thrown around when anyone questions gender ideology. It’s about preserving institutions that have meaning precisely because of their boundaries. The DAR exists to honor the daughters of Revolutionary patriots. Daughters. The word has a definition that predates modern gender theory by several thousand years.

Blackburn’s office said the legislation aims to preserve the group’s mission and ensure eligibility standards reflect its identity as a women’s organization. That sentence shouldn’t sound radical, yet here we are. When you have to legally codify that a women’s group should be for women, you’ve wandered pretty far from common sense.

The broader pattern is impossible to ignore. We’ve watched women’s sports get invaded by biological males who claim medals and scholarships from female athletes. We’ve seen women’s prisons house male inmates who suddenly discover their feminine side. We’ve witnessed medical school deans unable to answer whether men can have babies during congressional testimony, as if basic biology became optional sometime around 2015.

Traditional institutions built on sex-based distinctions are under assault, and the DAR situation is just another front in that battle. These organizations weren’t created arbitrarily. They served purposes rooted in reality, in the actual differences between men and women, in honoring specific contributions made by one sex or the other throughout history.

The free market of ideas should handle most cultural disputes, but when organizations holding federal charters start rewriting biological reality, maybe legislation becomes necessary. The DAR’s charter was granted by Congress in 1896. If they want to fundamentally alter what membership means, perhaps Congress gets a say in that transformation.

Blackburn understands what’s at stake. This isn’t just about one heritage organization. It’s about whether we’re going to let every institution that celebrates women get redefined into meaninglessness. If the Daughters of the American Revolution can include sons, then words mean nothing and history becomes whatever we want it to be today.

The legislation probably faces an uphill battle in a divided Congress, but sometimes you introduce bills to draw lines in the sand. To say clearly what you believe and force others to take a stand. Do biological women deserve spaces of their own, or doesn’t that matter anymore? It’s a simple question that deserves a simple answer.

Related: Senator Cotton Demands Investigation After Harvard’s Foreign Cash Haul Tops All Universities