An 88-year-old Michigan woman says she never donated nearly $150,000 to political campaigns, yet federal records claim she made more than 15,000 contributions through ActBlue over six years. That’s roughly seven donations every single day for 2,190 consecutive days. Does that sound remotely plausible to you?
Here’s what should alarm everyone, regardless of party affiliation. This isn’t some obscure fundraising platform processing pocket change for local school board races. ActBlue has moved more than $19 billion since its founding. That’s billion with a B. It’s the financial backbone of the progressive movement, the engine that powers campaigns from city councils to the United States Senate. And right now, it’s under congressional investigation for allegedly failing to prevent illegal foreign donations from infiltrating American elections.
You’d think that might give some candidates pause. You’d be wrong.
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez continues using the platform. So does Sen. Bernie Sanders. Michigan Senate hopeful Abdul El-Sayed hasn’t pumped the brakes either. These are the same politicians who lecture Americans about election integrity and foreign interference. The same voices who spent years warning about dark money and campaign finance corruption. Yet when their own fundraising apparatus faces serious questions, they just keep cashing the checks.
The irony is almost too perfect. Remember how the left spent the better part of four years obsessing over Russian interference? How every suspicious dollar became evidence of a grand conspiracy? But now we’ve got an actual investigation into potential foreign money flowing through their preferred donation portal, and the response is basically crickets.
Let’s be clear about what we’re seeing here. That elderly Michigan woman admitted she did use ActBlue to donate. She’s not claiming total innocence. But the gap between what she remembers giving and what the records show is staggering. Someone making seven political donations per day, every day, for six straight years isn’t a concerned citizen. That’s either a psychological disorder or fraud. There’s no middle ground.
Rep. Jim Jordan has been pushing for answers, which of course means the media has largely ignored the story. Congressional investigations only matter when they target the right people, apparently. When it’s Republicans in the crosshairs, journalists transform into bloodhounds. When it’s a Democratic fundraising platform potentially facilitating illegal contributions, suddenly everyone develops a curious case of incuriosity.
The free market works when information flows freely and consumers can make informed choices. Donors deserve to know their contributions are being handled legally and ethically. Candidates have a responsibility to ensure their fundraising operations meet basic standards of accountability. This isn’t complicated stuff. It’s the bare minimum we should expect from anyone seeking public office.
But here we are, watching progressive candidates continue business as usual with a platform facing serious allegations. They’re betting that their supporters won’t care, won’t ask questions, won’t demand better. They’re probably right. Partisan loyalty has a way of making people overlook inconvenient truths.
That 88-year-old woman deserves answers. So do the thousands of other donors whose names might be attached to contributions they never made. So does every American who believes elections should be free from foreign interference, regardless of which party benefits. This isn’t about left versus right. It’s about right versus wrong.
Related: Massachusetts Democrats Break Ranks Over Law They’re Calling Barbaric