There’s a moment in every campaign when a candidate says exactly what they believe. The mask slips. The talking points fade. You get a glimpse of the real convictions driving someone who wants to represent you in Washington. Hallie Shoffner just had hers, and it’s a doozy.

The Democrat challenging Senator Tom Cotton in Arkansas sat down for an interview and casually announced she’d trade five Americans for one undocumented immigrant because of how hard they work. Let that sink in for a second. A woman running for the United States Senate just assigned a mathematical value to American citizenship, and apparently we’re worth about twenty cents on the dollar compared to foreign nationals working illegally in this country.

“We’d trade five Americans for just one of them because of how hard they work,” Shoffner said without hesitation. This wasn’t a slip of the tongue. This was conviction. She genuinely believes that foreign workers who’ve broken our immigration laws are worth more than the citizens she’s asking to vote for her.

The comment came during a broader defense of undocumented farm workers, a topic Shoffner knows well. She grew up around them, worked with them through a nonprofit she ran, and has built her entire immigration platform around the premise that farmers simply can’t function without illegal labor. Every farmer employs undocumented immigrants at some point, she claims, so why are we making such a fuss about ICE rounding them up?

Here’s why. Because we’re a nation of laws, not a nation of whatever’s most convenient for farm owners at harvest time. Nobody disputes that agriculture is demanding work. Nobody’s saying immigrant labor hasn’t been part of American farming for generations. But there’s a legal process for bringing in foreign workers. The H-2A visa program exists precisely so farmers can hire seasonal agricultural workers legally. Shoffner’s own family farm apparently used this program for Mexican employees, so she knows it works.

Yet she’s spent her campaign defending people who bypass that legal process entirely, all while dismissing Americans as lazy by comparison. You know what message that sends to the millions of unemployed or underemployed Americans struggling to make ends meet? That they’re not even worth considering for these jobs because they don’t work hard enough to meet Hallie Shoffner’s standards.

The really interesting part comes when you look at her record. She previously ran a nonprofit called Seis Puentes that specifically helped undocumented Hispanics navigate American systems and even partnered with North Little Rock to get illegal immigrants valid photo IDs. She said on record that she’d vote to defund ICE as it currently exists because she wouldn’t spend “one more dime” on the agency. When that comment predictably sparked outrage, she backtracked and claimed she only wants to reform ICE, not defund it.

During a television interview, an anchor asked her directly whether she’d said she wanted more illegal immigrants in the country and wanted to abolish immigration law enforcement. Her answer was a flat “No.” Except we have the receipts. We have multiple interviews where she said exactly those things, just dressed up in softer language about reforming systems and creating pathways.

This is the progressive position on immigration stripped of its euphemisms. It’s not really about compassion or acknowledging the humanity of people seeking better lives. It’s about cheap labor and political power. Farmers want workers they can pay less. Democrats want future voters. And American workers caught in the middle are told they’re lazy and entitled for expecting their own government to prioritize their interests.

Shoffner even had the audacity to question why ICE agents need bulletproof vests, calling it “performative.” Tell that to the families of agents killed in the line of duty. Tell that to officers facing armed cartel members and human traffickers. But in Shoffner’s world, the real victims are the hardworking undocumented immigrants being unfairly targeted, not the Americans dealing with the consequences of open borders.

Tom Cotton has made border security and immigration enforcement central to his Senate career. He’s been proven right again and again as the crisis has worsened. His opponent apparently thinks that makes him anti-American and anti-safety, which is rich coming from someone who’d literally trade away American citizens for foreign workers.

Arkansas voters deserve to know exactly what they’re choosing in this race. On one side, you have a senator who believes American laws should be enforced and American workers should come first. On the other, you have a candidate who’s built her entire professional life around helping people circumvent immigration law and who openly admits she values illegal immigrants more than her fellow citizens. That’s not compassion. That’s contempt.

Related: Marco Rubio Just Drew a Line in the Sand Over South Africa’s Race Policies