Van Hollen Says PTSD Excuses Nazi Ink as Democrats Scramble to Defend Their Maine Mess

Let me get this straight. The Democratic Party, the same crowd that spent years lecturing Americans about microaggressions and problematic Halloween costumes, is now asking us to give a second chance to a Senate candidate with a Nazi tattoo. You can’t make this stuff up.

Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland has stepped up to defend Graham Platner, the Army and Marine Corps veteran now running as the leading Democrat against Senator Susan Collins in Maine. Van Hollen’s argument? Platner’s Nazi imagery and questionable online history might stem from PTSD related to his Afghanistan deployment, and hey, everyone deserves another shot at redemption.

The timing here is almost poetic. Maine Governor Janet Mills just suspended her own Senate campaign Thursday, which means Platner isn’t just some fringe candidate anymore. He’s the guy. The Democratic establishment’s guy, apparently. Van Hollen told Punchbowl News that Platner “can beat Susan Collins” and connect with blue-collar workers, labor groups, and Native American tribes. That’s quite the sales pitch for someone whose body art celebrates one of history’s most evil regimes.

Here’s what really grinds my gears about this whole situation. We’ve watched conservatives get destroyed for far less. A decade-old tweet with the wrong phrasing? Career over. An awkward joke that didn’t age well? Public execution in the town square of social media. But a literal Nazi tattoo gets the PTSD excuse and the “second chances matter” treatment from party leadership.

I have nothing but respect for veterans who’ve served in combat zones. PTSD is real, it’s serious, and it deserves our attention and support. But let’s not pretend that mental health struggles give anyone a free pass to embrace Nazi symbolism. Plenty of veterans came home from Afghanistan without deciding that Third Reich imagery was a good look. The vast majority of people suffering from PTSD don’t tattoo swastikas on their bodies.

Van Hollen’s defense strategy reveals something deeper about how the political left operates. They’ve built an entire industry around cancel culture and purity tests, but those standards evaporate the moment they need a warm body to fill a ballot line. Suddenly context matters. Suddenly we need to consider the whole person. Suddenly redemption arcs are possible.

This is the same party that tried to tank Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court nomination over uncorroborated allegations from high school. The same folks who demand Republicans denounce every controversial figure who’s ever voted red. But their own Senate candidate sports Nazi ink and we’re supposed to nod along while they explain it away.

Susan Collins isn’t perfect. She’s frustrated plenty of conservatives over the years with her moderate stances. But she’s never had to explain away fascist tattoos or troubling online comments. The contrast couldn’t be starker, and Maine voters aren’t stupid. They can see what’s happening here.

The Democratic establishment is banking on tribal loyalty. They’re hoping that partisan hatred of Republicans will override basic common sense. Vote blue no matter who, even if “who” happens to be someone who thought Nazi imagery was acceptable at any point in their adult life. That’s not a political strategy. That’s moral bankruptcy dressed up as pragmatism.

Van Hollen says Platner has had his “ups and downs” but can connect with voters. That’s one way to describe it. Another way would be to admit that Democrats in Maine are stuck with a deeply flawed candidate and they’re scrambling to make the best of an embarrassing situation. Second chances are fine for people who’ve genuinely changed and shown remorse. But political expediency isn’t the same thing as redemption, and voters deserve better than this cynical calculation.

Related: The Justice Department Won’t Let James Comey Off the Hook